Anonymous wrote:https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/C3YV2Q6BF307/$file/SBWS_June%2015_2021_FINAL.pdf
This is the presentation. There are some details on the number of kids who dis-enrolled during the 20-21 school year (and how many have re-enrolled -- about 30% so far). Also includes details on the number who applied for and were approved for full virtual '21-22 school year. There will probably be around 125 high school students doing virtual. Around 400 students in all of FCPS. That's not a lot... and I doubt that they can have full classes of just virtual kids... but who knows.
Also includes recommendations for grading policies for next school year.
They are looking to add more time for professional development by either having an early release day every month, another no school day added every quarter, or hiring subs to cover for teachers who are doing Prof Devel activities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:50% rule?
Grade inflation. No child can ever get below a 50% on an assignment. Even if they don't turn it in.
It isn’t inflation, nimrod. A 50 is still an F. It reduces an F to a 10% range the same as any other letter grade and ensures if a kid has one bad quarter their entire year isn’t unrecoverable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MORE professional development? Ughhhhh. As a teacher (and a parent), this is not what teachers (at least at my school) want. The professional development is always Gatehouse created to fit whatever their new priority for the year is (because we apparently can’t focus on the same thing for more than a year or two) and has never once been helpful to my curriculum area. The teacher workdays are helpful for grading and unit planning w my colleagues, but I would much rather have students on ALL of the professional development days than listen to hastily prepared Gatehouse presentations. This is a waste of time and just leads to more childcare needs for parents.
If they don't add extra time off, how else will they have time tell you the kids are behind and need to recover their learning loss?![]()
Sorry just found the topics they need to address in professional development juxtaposed with suggesting removing more school time as hilariously ironic.
Anonymous wrote:MORE professional development? Ughhhhh. As a teacher (and a parent), this is not what teachers (at least at my school) want. The professional development is always Gatehouse created to fit whatever their new priority for the year is (because we apparently can’t focus on the same thing for more than a year or two) and has never once been helpful to my curriculum area. The teacher workdays are helpful for grading and unit planning w my colleagues, but I would much rather have students on ALL of the professional development days than listen to hastily prepared Gatehouse presentations. This is a waste of time and just leads to more childcare needs for parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:50% rule?
Grade inflation. No child can ever get below a 50% on an assignment. Even if they don't turn it in.
Anonymous wrote:50% rule?
Anonymous wrote:I understand that VDOE and FCPS require a lot of training for teachers, but have they considered asking how much PD that they already do is fluff and getting rid of that?