06/11/2021 10:35
Subject: Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
good rankings for MD teams. problem is when you can't submit 90% of non-MD tournaments, these really aren't national rankings.
Anonymous
06/11/2021 10:28
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Girls side is generally close to correct, but agree YJ underrepresented (in MS) likely because don’t play spring league. Their strongest 26 team should be top 5ish and the Traditions team should not be on there - looks like a “mistake” when you click on game schedule.
But I would not say the information on the girls side is useless or even close to, especially if you look at where “local” teams are ranked against each other.
Anonymous
06/11/2021 08:31
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Girls side, Yellow Jackets isn't in the 25s list and they are definitely the #1 team. I'm guessing since they haven't played a tournament in a year they aren't there, so can't put much stock into these lists...
Anonymous
06/10/2021 23:09
Subject: Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Just looking at the 2022 top 20, hard to argue that any team is more than 3 away from where it belongs - other than maybe Crabs and MadLax which are rated too highly on program reputation and not the specific team's strength, or in this case weakness.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 22:51
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
These look pretty damn on point for high school aged girls. Anyone saying they aren’t is not being honest.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 18:46
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Anonymous wrote:#Worthless
These are basically MadLax rankings and are more of a marketing tool than anything else.
Agree, but pretty funny that the regular Madlax team is ranked ahead of its world series team.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 18:30
Subject: Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Anonymous wrote:For older boys, the rankings look fairly accurate.
Not the 2022 class
Anonymous
06/10/2021 18:17
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Not sure about the boys, but the girls look close to spot on. They use a formula. The girls results are similar to NGLL results with a few other teams mixed in.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 17:10
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
Absolutely worthless on both girls and boys side. Someone likes to stir the pot by bringing this none sense up
Anonymous
06/10/2021 16:50
Subject: Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
For older boys, the rankings look fairly accurate.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 16:16
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
I don't know that the rankings are worthless. I checked several years on the girls side, and the ranking look fairly accurate based on what I've seen at tourneys.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 16:00
Subject: Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
+100
Anonymous
06/10/2021 15:57
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
#Worthless
These are basically MadLax rankings and are more of a marketing tool than anything else.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 15:55
Subject: Re:Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)
These rankings really don't mean anything at all. I know of a club team that beat 3 top 15 programs and didn't even make the rankings, yet college coaches keep coming back to that program to recruit in some top 30 schools. I wouldn't put to much stock in these rankings at all.
Anonymous
06/10/2021 15:09
Subject: Updated Club Rankings (girls and boys)