Anonymous wrote:It depends on if they try to keep a cluster model with articulation from ES to MS to HS the same for everyone. I hope they don’t and this is what finally causes them to break down those walls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just wondering about when Woodward HS opens 2026, and MCPS redraws boundaries for Woodward, WJ and I am assuming Einstein, are they also going to redraw the boundaries for North Bethesda MS, Tilden MS and Silver Creek MS?
For example, DS will be in MS in 2026 - what is the likelyhood he will stay with his cohort through 8th grade or will they all be split up?
Yes, the Woodward HS boundary study will include the DCC (or at least that's the current plan).
And yes, you should assume that there will also be changes in which middle schools go to which high schools.
Anonymous wrote:Just wondering about when Woodward HS opens 2026, and MCPS redraws boundaries for Woodward, WJ and I am assuming Einstein, are they also going to redraw the boundaries for North Bethesda MS, Tilden MS and Silver Creek MS?
For example, DS will be in MS in 2026 - what is the likelyhood he will stay with his cohort through 8th grade or will they all be split up?
Anonymous wrote:Just wondering about when Woodward HS opens 2026, and MCPS redraws boundaries for Woodward, WJ and I am assuming Einstein, are they also going to redraw the boundaries for North Bethesda MS, Tilden MS and Silver Creek MS?
For example, DS will be in MS in 2026 - what is the likelyhood he will stay with his cohort through 8th grade or will they all be split up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not make the entire downcounty a consortium?
I don’t think it’s a terrible idea to add say BCC, WJ and Woodward to the DCC. Or split that into 2 different consortia, maybe something like BCC/Blair/Northwood/Kennedy in one and WJ/Woodward/Einstein/Wheaton in the other, but I think that many people in BCC and WJ would probably balk at that as evidenced by the reaction of one of the previous posters.
Anonymous wrote:Why not make the entire downcounty a consortium?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a new consortium would be a good idea. Maybe one that puts WJ, Woodward, and BCC together.
Or a southwest consortium: BCC, Woodward, WJ, Churchill, and Whitman. Maybe add Wootton. Instead of the "W" schools they'll be "SW" schools.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on if they try to keep a cluster model with articulation from ES to MS to HS the same for everyone. I hope they don’t and this is what finally causes them to break down those walls.
Anonymous wrote:No. I am in one of those schools, and my peers and I do not like or want a consortium. Yes, MS articulation will likely change.
Anonymous wrote:I think a new consortium would be a good idea. Maybe one that puts WJ, Woodward, and BCC together.