Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve had 2 kids go through and it’s been fine. They’ve both had a few duds but overall great teachers who genuinely like this age group and their subject matter. Not a huge fan of Mr. Boykin, I think he’s pretty harsh and doesn’t seem to like his job that much. Thankfully my interactions with him haven’t been too frequent.
When he was at nottingham everyone said he hated that he couldn’t afford to live here (apparently he went to local schools), and was a huge douche to parents.
Never mind, that’s the assistant principal not the principal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have the good teachers stayed or have they moved to Hamm? I feel like I heard about some good ones moving there on DCUM.
I don’t think that there’s any way to objectively say whether Williamsburg had a net gain or loss of good teachers when Hamm was staffed.
Anonymous wrote:People move to the neighborhood bc of the schools then complain incessantly. The principal is not super enthusiastic and not a great communicator, I agree with all that. The teachers we’ve had gave been great though and our kids are happy.
Anonymous wrote:
It was adequate. What else is there to say. At least it should be less crazy overcrowded now that Hamm opened.
+1. Typical middle school in an upper income area. Teachers are fine if unexciting, lots of dumb rules that are inequitably enforced, principal runs a decent school but is a bit surly and uninspiring, some student bullying but not anything extreme, facilities are old and a bit dismal.
My kid finished there 2 years ago. We were pleased by her education and experience overall, but wouldn't call it a magical time.
Anonymous wrote:Have the good teachers stayed or have they moved to Hamm? I feel like I heard about some good ones moving there on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:It was adequate. What else is there to say. At least it should be less crazy overcrowded now that Hamm opened.