Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you pay live in nannies less because you give them room and board?
Room and board shouldn't be a considerable factor in pay. For example, if you would pay a live-out nanny $20/hour, paying less than $15 to a live-in wouldn't be worth it to me (I'm a nanny.)
Why would anyone have a live-in nanny if you are paying almost full price? I am considering this, but I make $1500 renting my basement. I would want to pay at least $1000 less a nanny that lives with us and does not have to pay rent somewhere else.
Anonymous wrote:I have been both. The main advantage for you with a live in is that the cost is less. The advantage for me is not having to worry about rent, mortgage, bills etc. it’s also a good way for young women to see a different part of the country for a couple of years without committing to and paying for housing. I’m English but I had a bunch of American nanny friends from the Midwest. I don’t think the hours you need should be a factor. My last live out nanny job I worked at 630am 5 days a week, I’m a morning person. If you do a live in I would find out as much as you can in the interview about how social they are and how much they are likely to be home realistically.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Live In nannies should have defined work hours. They are not available 24/7 unless you are paying them 24/7.
According to federal law, you cannot charge room and board if YOU make living in a job requirement. Many LI nannies now charge what a live out nanny charges, because being a LI is an additional job stressor.
A nanny takes care of your children. LI or LO, her job description should prioritize the children and household tasks directly related to the children. It’s unlikely that a LI nanny will be eager to work additional hours doing cooking or cleaning unless you are paying a very high hourly rate. $40/hour might convince someone to work additional hours beyond the 52 or so you may need to cover your work hours to clean your house or cook your meals. So if you can afford to pay ultra top end hourly wages, you might find someone to work 60+ hours a week doing everything. You’d be looking at paying around $120,000 a year though.
You don’t sound like a family that’s excited to add an adult to your home. The friends who love having live in nannies - what are they paying per hour? Are they having their nanny do childcare/housekeeping/cooking/family laundry? Why do they love having a live in?
I am sure this is not how it works or why would anyone have a live in nanny? I make less than 120,000 and I have a PhD (working 50 hours a week and paying for my room and board)... maybe I should be a live in nanny instead
Anonymous wrote:Live In nannies should have defined work hours. They are not available 24/7 unless you are paying them 24/7.
According to federal law, you cannot charge room and board if YOU make living in a job requirement. Many LI nannies now charge what a live out nanny charges, because being a LI is an additional job stressor.
A nanny takes care of your children. LI or LO, her job description should prioritize the children and household tasks directly related to the children. It’s unlikely that a LI nanny will be eager to work additional hours doing cooking or cleaning unless you are paying a very high hourly rate. $40/hour might convince someone to work additional hours beyond the 52 or so you may need to cover your work hours to clean your house or cook your meals. So if you can afford to pay ultra top end hourly wages, you might find someone to work 60+ hours a week doing everything. You’d be looking at paying around $120,000 a year though.
You don’t sound like a family that’s excited to add an adult to your home. The friends who love having live in nannies - what are they paying per hour? Are they having their nanny do childcare/housekeeping/cooking/family laundry? Why do they love having a live in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you pay live in nannies less because you give them room and board?
Room and board shouldn't be a considerable factor in pay. For example, if you would pay a live-out nanny $20/hour, paying less than $15 to a live-in wouldn't be worth it to me (I'm a nanny.)
Why would anyone have a live-in nanny if you are paying almost full price? I am considering this, but I make $1500 renting my basement. I would want to pay at least $1000 less a nanny that lives with us and does not have to pay rent somewhere else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you pay live in nannies less because you give them room and board?
Room and board shouldn't be a considerable factor in pay. For example, if you would pay a live-out nanny $20/hour, paying less than $15 to a live-in wouldn't be worth it to me (I'm a nanny.)
Anonymous wrote:Do you pay live in nannies less because you give them room and board?
Anonymous wrote:Can the basement have a kitchen? Separate entrance?
9-5 is not "only". You have to find somebody who likes their off time and won't be hanging out with family.