Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?
He owned over 100 slaves. Unlike some of the other Founders, he did not free them and make provisions for them in his will.
Can we learn from the past rather than try to change the past? This is stupid.
This is the most absurd argument ever. Changing a school name so that it doesn't honor a slaveholder is not changing the past! It's learning from the past and changing out actions now and we realize, oh, that's really not cool to honor that person this way!! I can't understand people who think changing the name of a random high school suddenly erases that person from history!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?
He owned over 100 slaves. Unlike some of the other Founders, he did not free them and make provisions for them in his will.
Can we learn from the past rather than try to change the past? This is stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?
He owned over 100 slaves. Unlike some of the other Founders, he did not free them and make provisions for them in his will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?
He owned over 100 slaves. Unlike some of the other Founders, he did not free them and make provisions for them in his will.
Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?
Because we can only name high schools these days for saints if we name them for people and there are very few human saints.
Anonymous wrote:Why not just call it Falls Church City HS ?
Anonymous wrote:Why are we renaming George mason?