Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. He is also my dad's financial advisor, and has been for years and years, and he came to my dad very highly recommended by someone he trusted as well. He's been my advisor for about 10 years now, and my dad's for probably 20. He takes 1% of total investments per year (that goes down to 0.5% when your assets reach a certain level, so my dad only pays a half a percent), with NO other fees or anything, so it's very transparent, which I like. I've averaged returns of around 8-9% returns during those 10 years, so he is significantly beating the market, and the 1% fee is worth it. My husband was skeptical (I've been with the FA since before I met him) and was very "there are no fee accounts" to which I say - everyone is getting paid. If there are no fee accounts, the fees are just hidden, like with kick backs from various funds. Having eased into it, he's now completely on board.
He manages our retirement accounts completely. He also managed our house savings account when we were saving for a downpayment, but we've now bought. He will likely at some point manage our kids 529s. He is also available for advice. He's reviewed our monthly budgets, given general financial advice, recommended insurance options, and helped us decide on a budget for our house. Basically, he'll do a call with us anytime if we have a question, but we're fairly low touch.
I love this arrangement, but finding someone you trust would be really scary for me. Getting a recommendation from my dad, who I trust completely, made it easy, but obviously that's not replicable.
It's obviously your choice whether to hire a financial advisor-- I pay someone to mow my lawn because that's how I want to spend my money. However, it's very unlikely that your advisor can beat the market long term (and certainly not on a risk-adjusted return basis). For example, if you just invested in the S&P500 index, you would have seen annual returns of almost 14% a year over the last 10 years. Also, if you are paying 1% of assets and getting 8-9% returns, you are paying over 10% of your annual returns, which will probably reduce your ultimate retirement "nest egg" by a pretty big chunk.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. He is also my dad's financial advisor, and has been for years and years, and he came to my dad very highly recommended by someone he trusted as well. He's been my advisor for about 10 years now, and my dad's for probably 20. He takes 1% of total investments per year (that goes down to 0.5% when your assets reach a certain level, so my dad only pays a half a percent), with NO other fees or anything, so it's very transparent, which I like. I've averaged returns of around 8-9% returns during those 10 years, so he is significantly beating the market, and the 1% fee is worth it. My husband was skeptical (I've been with the FA since before I met him) and was very "there are no fee accounts" to which I say - everyone is getting paid. If there are no fee accounts, the fees are just hidden, like with kick backs from various funds. Having eased into it, he's now completely on board.
He manages our retirement accounts completely. He also managed our house savings account when we were saving for a downpayment, but we've now bought. He will likely at some point manage our kids 529s. He is also available for advice. He's reviewed our monthly budgets, given general financial advice, recommended insurance options, and helped us decide on a budget for our house. Basically, he'll do a call with us anytime if we have a question, but we're fairly low touch.
I love this arrangement, but finding someone you trust would be really scary for me. Getting a recommendation from my dad, who I trust completely, made it easy, but obviously that's not replicable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most people have the intelligence and common sense to manage their own money. It's just that they may not have the discipline or will power to keep to a goal/strategy, that's where a financial advisor may be worth the fee.
While this may be true, I'm the person who wrote the longer post above and that's not why I have a financial advisor. It's for the same reason I have a cleaning person - to save time. Yes, I could do my own research and choose my own investments, but I prefer to spend my time with my family and have a professional do it. I don't actually have any issues with discipline/will power as far as finances (eating cookies, that's another story).
Same here. We have a financial advisor, even though we understand finance well. Before we had one, "rebalance portfolio" and "do tax loss harvesting" ended up about #100 on the to-do list = it never got done. Now that we have someone doing it, that's worth it in better returns compared to our previous strategy of doing nothing because there was no time.
Also we use them for advice on retirement, estate planning, tax minimization strategies, and the best way for grandparents to give $$ to our kids for education.
Once we retire, I would consider dropping them as you have fewer life changes (kids going to college, etc.) taking place, and more time to actively manage your investments.
Anonymous wrote:No. I'm smarter than most people and I like learning about financial matters, so it doesn't make sense for me to pay someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most people have the intelligence and common sense to manage their own money. It's just that they may not have the discipline or will power to keep to a goal/strategy, that's where a financial advisor may be worth the fee.
While this may be true, I'm the person who wrote the longer post above and that's not why I have a financial advisor. It's for the same reason I have a cleaning person - to save time. Yes, I could do my own research and choose my own investments, but I prefer to spend my time with my family and have a professional do it. I don't actually have any issues with discipline/will power as far as finances (eating cookies, that's another story).
Anonymous wrote:I think most people have the intelligence and common sense to manage their own money. It's just that they may not have the discipline or will power to keep to a goal/strategy, that's where a financial advisor may be worth the fee.