Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah that building wasn't put up in a few days... it had been under construction for a while and it sounds like multiple stop work orders were issued over the summer, so it's surprising that they didn't keep a closer eye on it. I get they can't be detail oriented on everything but prior stop work orders seem like they would be a red flag for closer supervision.
Well it looks like nothing but cheap plywood - not really surprised it collapsed.
Yeah, I don't know anything about construction, but at 5 stories..shouldn't there be some support besides just...wood?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah that building wasn't put up in a few days... it had been under construction for a while and it sounds like multiple stop work orders were issued over the summer, so it's surprising that they didn't keep a closer eye on it. I get they can't be detail oriented on everything but prior stop work orders seem like they would be a red flag for closer supervision.
Well it looks like nothing but cheap plywood - not really surprised it collapsed.
Yeah, I don't know anything about construction, but at 5 stories..shouldn't there be some support besides just...wood?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah that building wasn't put up in a few days... it had been under construction for a while and it sounds like multiple stop work orders were issued over the summer, so it's surprising that they didn't keep a closer eye on it. I get they can't be detail oriented on everything but prior stop work orders seem like they would be a red flag for closer supervision.
Well it looks like nothing but cheap plywood - not really surprised it collapsed.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah that building wasn't put up in a few days... it had been under construction for a while and it sounds like multiple stop work orders were issued over the summer, so it's surprising that they didn't keep a closer eye on it. I get they can't be detail oriented on everything but prior stop work orders seem like they would be a red flag for closer supervision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the builders fault. DCRA approves permits and checks work at points along the way. If they hired private inspectors, then that is on them. Insurance company will figure it out.
Isn't that the whole point of checking/inspections? To prevent dangerous incidents like this?
There are hundreds of building projects happening at any given time in DC, and wood framing like the one that collapsed can be put up in a matter of days. There's simply no way for inspectors to be at every building site often enough to prevent every accident.
The point of inspections is not to make sure every single building is built correctly, it's to catch enough of the ones that aren't to keep builders honest. Sadly there are unscrupulous people out there who will still take that risk to increase their profits, but that doesn't mean the system is useless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the builders fault. DCRA approves permits and checks work at points along the way. If they hired private inspectors, then that is on them. Insurance company will figure it out.
Isn't that the whole point of checking/inspections? To prevent dangerous incidents like this?
Anonymous wrote:It's the builders fault. DCRA approves permits and checks work at points along the way. If they hired private inspectors, then that is on them. Insurance company will figure it out.