Anonymous wrote:It's complex because OOB families want feeder rights. And there are a lot of OOB families, all over the city, pushing their councilmembers to preserve feeder rights. Whereas the people who want to end feeder rights are clustered in Ward 3, meaning 7 other ward reps can ignore them and the at-large councilmembers can win an election without their support.
I think feeder rights should end: if you get into an ES OOB, you have a right to stay there through 5th. That would also help many EOTP schools where people are happy but leave for a better MS feed, and it would be good for people who move to DC when their kids are a little older. As a compromise, students from feeder schools could get a lottery preference if they want to go to their destination school. Better would be if it were an at-risk feeder preference and then a non-at-risk. They could also phase out the preference over time: kids in grades 3-8 and when the rules change have feeder rights, kids in PK3-2 have feeder preference, kids not yet at an OOB school have no right or preference and their parents can lottery accordingly.
And yes, on top of this route Bancroft to MacFarland and Roosevelt. Either send Adams to Roosevelt too, or make Oyster-Adams a PK3-5 school across two campuses (like Peabody and Watkins) and send the middle schoolers to MacFarland too. All the dual language schools should have the same feeder pattern. This would also allow for more seats in bilingual programs and more PK classrooms WOTP where there are long waitlists now.
Anonymous wrote:
Take Bancroft and MArie Reed out of Oyster middle schools feed. Put them in MacFarland.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very simple and they don't want to do it because it would make the school system way more segregated than it already is, there would be so much blowback politically. This should be obvious to you.
But there are set aside seats for at-risk students and Bancroft and Shepherd are diverse enough to not give off a segregation feel.
DCPS has to plan for the long term and Bancroft and Shepherd may become less diverse. And it would make Wilson less diverse overall. It may be that the OOB population at Bancroft and Shepherd is more diverse than the IB population, I don't know. Bottom line, you might be okay with the school system becoming more segregated but DCPS and the Mayor clearly are not.
The question is which way is it trending.
I imagine IB vs. OOB are pretty close in terms of diversity at Shepherd— I know several white OOB families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very simple and they don't want to do it because it would make the school system way more segregated than it already is, there would be so much blowback politically. This should be obvious to you.
But there are set aside seats for at-risk students and Bancroft and Shepherd are diverse enough to not give off a segregation feel.
DCPS has to plan for the long term and Bancroft and Shepherd may become less diverse. And it would make Wilson less diverse overall. It may be that the OOB population at Bancroft and Shepherd is more diverse than the IB population, I don't know. Bottom line, you might be okay with the school system becoming more segregated but DCPS and the Mayor clearly are not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very simple and they don't want to do it because it would make the school system way more segregated than it already is, there would be so much blowback politically. This should be obvious to you.
But there are set aside seats for at-risk students and Bancroft and Shepherd are diverse enough to not give off a segregation feel.
Anonymous wrote:It is very simple and they don't want to do it because it would make the school system way more segregated than it already is, there would be so much blowback politically. This should be obvious to you.