Anonymous wrote:It’s still not safe for kids, especially with the new strains. And I’m assuming people being who have opted to continue virtual learning have found a way to make it work for them. Why does it matter to you? I believe virtual learning should permanently become an option as long as there are dedicated virtual learning teachers at each school so that no one has to teach concurrently.
Anonymous wrote:It’s still not safe for kids, especially with the new strains. And I’m assuming people being who have opted to continue virtual learning have found a way to make it work for them. Why does it matter to you? I believe virtual learning should permanently become an option as long as there are dedicated virtual learning teachers at each school so that no one has to teach concurrently.
Anonymous wrote:It’s still not safe for kids, especially with the new strains. And I’m assuming people being who have opted to continue virtual learning have found a way to make it work for them. Why does it matter to you? I believe virtual learning should permanently become an option as long as there are dedicated virtual learning teachers at each school so that no one has to teach concurrently.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think people realize there was a virtual option before the pandemic. I have a niece with a very serious pediatric cancer- she was doing virtual school before the pandemic and has continued that way, so this isn’t new for her. Her immune system is way too fragile and many organs are compromised due to the intensity of her treatments.
I don’t think many people understand that there are unique situations that you may not be aware of (like the one above).
We are sending our kids back in person for hybrid, but only because we will be fully vaccinated by the time they would go back...and because we have certain underlying conditions... but I definitely have an understanding of distance learning needing to continue for people for health reasons, or simply wanting the choice to continue everything virtually until there is more control over the situation.
Some children are doing better with DL than in regular school. I think it should be an option going foward.Anonymous wrote:In every county there seems to be a cohort of parents that fight tooth and nail for DL for their kids. I don't understand this. The vaccine is out. The vaccine is the answer to herd immunity. Masks work.
Question for these parents: What year will you be comfortable sending your kids into school? 2023? 2024? 2025? Never?
Are you honestly expecting 100% eradication of this virus?
Anonymous wrote:Majority of parents will send their kids back when it’s safe. There is no vaccine for kids and many adults are not eligible. You may be ok with sending yours but it’s ok we are not. That makes it safer for yours. If people were behaving differently in terms of travel, socializing and all that then maybe it would be safer. But people choose to continue the spread so the rest of us get punished by their choices. Stop caring about others wanting DL and be responsible so we can all safely return.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In every county there seems to be a cohort of parents that fight tooth and nail for DL for their kids. I don't understand this. The vaccine is out. The vaccine is the answer to herd immunity. Masks work.
Question for these parents: What year will you be comfortable sending your kids into school? 2023? 2024? 2025? Never?
Are you honestly expecting 100% eradication of this virus?
They don't want it "forever," but you are being disingenuous and you already knew that.
Start with vaccinations for kids.
Oh, and mind your own business.
Anonymous wrote:In every county there seems to be a cohort of parents that fight tooth and nail for DL for their kids. I don't understand this. The vaccine is out. The vaccine is the answer to herd immunity. Masks work.
Question for these parents: What year will you be comfortable sending your kids into school? 2023? 2024? 2025? Never?
Are you honestly expecting 100% eradication of this virus?