Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two things. There are already priests in the DMV performing same-sex ceremonies on the down-low. This is not a too well kept secret.
Also, with President Biden being the most visible example of a faithful highly devout Catholic who holds progressive beliefs, I think the Church is changing from the bottom up. The Church’s old male hierarchy has to parrot the catechism, but I think most Catholics simply ignore them at this point.
It’s disappointing though because we saw Pope Francis as an agent of progressive radically needed change in the Church but he’s mostly proved to be as sadly conservative as his predecessors Benedict and John Paul II.
The ceremonies aren’t valid, but if they want to wave their hands in front a couple, that’s up to them. If you don’t accept the authority of the magisterium and the Pope, you’re a Protestant. Just own it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until the church teaches that sex is not just for pro-creation, there is not going to be acceptance of gay marriage.
It teaches that sex is ordered toward procreation. It’s more nuanced than you give it credit for. Infertile couples aren’t doing anything wrong.
"Ordered Toward" is an artful way of picking and choosing which people can have sex, and in what ways. You won't be seeing encyclicals on blowjobs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until the church teaches that sex is not just for pro-creation, there is not going to be acceptance of gay marriage.
It teaches that sex is ordered toward procreation. It’s more nuanced than you give it credit for. Infertile couples aren’t doing anything wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Two things. There are already priests in the DMV performing same-sex ceremonies on the down-low. This is not a too well kept secret.
Also, with President Biden being the most visible example of a faithful highly devout Catholic who holds progressive beliefs, I think the Church is changing from the bottom up. The Church’s old male hierarchy has to parrot the catechism, but I think most Catholics simply ignore them at this point.
It’s disappointing though because we saw Pope Francis as an agent of progressive radically needed change in the Church but he’s mostly proved to be as sadly conservative as his predecessors Benedict and John Paul II.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until the church teaches that sex is not just for pro-creation, there is not going to be acceptance of gay marriage.
It teaches that sex is ordered toward procreation. It’s more nuanced than you give it credit for. Infertile couples aren’t doing anything wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until the church teaches that sex is not just for pro-creation, there is not going to be acceptance of gay marriage.
It teaches that sex is ordered toward procreation. It’s more nuanced than you give it credit for. Infertile couples aren’t doing anything wrong.
That’s a dubious distinction. It’s time for the Church to nuance itself out of existence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Until the church teaches that sex is not just for pro-creation, there is not going to be acceptance of gay marriage.
It teaches that sex is ordered toward procreation. It’s more nuanced than you give it credit for. Infertile couples aren’t doing anything wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Until the church teaches that sex is not just for pro-creation, there is not going to be acceptance of gay marriage.
Anonymous wrote:
The “natural order” involves might over right, oppression and murder in multiple species, including Homo Sapiens, so if I were you I’d find another argument![]()
- biologist
Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/pope-same-sex-unions-licit/2021/03/15/8c51ee80-8581-11eb-be4a-24b89f616f2c_story.html
I can't say I am surprised, but it is another failure of the church to acknowledge science, namely that homosexuality is part of the natural order, and therefore it is part of God's plan.