Anonymous wrote:There is a chance in 10 that we'll find out about a school outbreak, now.
I don't understand how they could play bait and switch to this extent in the middle of a term. I am so disgusted. The promise of testing each opted-in student every 10 days was a factor in the decision of many families whether to send their kids into school. What can they do now? Nothing at all. It's unethical to take away a promised safety layer after that safety layer has been an important factor in families' decisions to send their children back.
And to make that decision just when the cohort quarantining map was *turning red* with a dozen schools a week sending out notifications of a positive person having sat in a room for hours with a dozen other people? Unconscionable. Irresponsible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a chance in 10 that we'll find out about a school outbreak, now.
I don't understand how they could play bait and switch to this extent in the middle of a term. I am so disgusted. The promise of testing each opted-in student every 10 days was a factor in the decision of many families whether to send their kids into school. What can they do now? Nothing at all. It's unethical to take away a promised safety layer after that safety layer has been an important factor in families' decisions to send their children back.
And to make that decision just when the cohort quarantining map was *turning red* with a dozen schools a week sending out notifications of a positive person having sat in a room for hours with a dozen other people? Unconscionable. Irresponsible.
Asymptomatic testing only accurately detects COVID 40% of the time across the general population. That number is lower for young children. If you actually think that that asymptomatic testing every 10 days help, you are gravely misled. If anything, it actually hurts because it can provide false reassurance.
Anonymous wrote:There is a chance in 10 that we'll find out about a school outbreak, now.
I don't understand how they could play bait and switch to this extent in the middle of a term. I am so disgusted. The promise of testing each opted-in student every 10 days was a factor in the decision of many families whether to send their kids into school. What can they do now? Nothing at all. It's unethical to take away a promised safety layer after that safety layer has been an important factor in families' decisions to send their children back.
And to make that decision just when the cohort quarantining map was *turning red* with a dozen schools a week sending out notifications of a positive person having sat in a room for hours with a dozen other people? Unconscionable. Irresponsible.
Anonymous wrote:So no testing?
Anonymous wrote:Looks like a recipe for disaster.
Anonymous wrote:(I apologize in advance, but it's "asymptomatic." The term "asymptotic" is mostly a math term.)