Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it occur to your that maybe the biographies exaggerated the skills of the royals? Your kid is fine...
This, plus I wonder if those biographies touch in how emotionally stunted and miserable most of those people are/were?
Try looking into language immersion programs for school if that’s important to you.
I’m sure they were, but that’s not because of their tutors. It’s because they had terrible parents who didn’t know how to “parent”, and therapy wasn’t invented yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did it occur to your that maybe the biographies exaggerated the skills of the royals? Your kid is fine...
This, plus I wonder if those biographies touch in how emotionally stunted and miserable most of those people are/were?
Try looking into language immersion programs for school if that’s important to you.
Anonymous wrote:Did it occur to your that maybe the biographies exaggerated the skills of the royals? Your kid is fine...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't satisfy yourself with a normal kid? Cuz that's what you've got. A curious kid who's friendly. At 3, why do you think you should have more than that?
It’s more like... I want to make sure I’m not failing to provide her opportunities, to take full advantage of her innate talent. If she doesn’t have aptitude, fine, no problem. But if she does and I overlooked it and therefore failed to foster it, then I would feel bad
Anonymous wrote:You can't satisfy yourself with a normal kid? Cuz that's what you've got. A curious kid who's friendly. At 3, why do you think you should have more than that?