Anonymous wrote:Is there any of this info on the ACPS website? I’m curious what they said about the metrics. At first there were no metrics and now it’s all about metrics, but what if the numbers literally aren’t there? Just curious what the discussion was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The tone of the meeting last night was way different than before. Unlike the doom and gloom, and excessive remedial man-splaining he excels at - Hutchings sounded optimistic that it was really going to happen this time. I'm guessing the political pressure got to him. The metrics he worships aren't actually that different from last week - and are certainly magnitudes worse than in the fall when none of this was "feasible".
He's an opportunistic jerk, who cares only about himself. I think he sees the writing on the wall and wants to get ahead of the "narrative" - which is basically the science shows schools are safe.
Whatever, I'll take it - my kids need to be in school - I just wish they didn't have to be in his school district.
All of this is 100% accurate.
But all will be forgiven by most ACPS parents as they all continue to pretend that they aren't standing on the deck of the Titanic as it sinks.
Anonymous wrote:The tone of the meeting last night was way different than before. Unlike the doom and gloom, and excessive remedial man-splaining he excels at - Hutchings sounded optimistic that it was really going to happen this time. I'm guessing the political pressure got to him. The metrics he worships aren't actually that different from last week - and are certainly magnitudes worse than in the fall when none of this was "feasible".
He's an opportunistic jerk, who cares only about himself. I think he sees the writing on the wall and wants to get ahead of the "narrative" - which is basically the science shows schools are safe.
Whatever, I'll take it - my kids need to be in school - I just wish they didn't have to be in his school district.
Anonymous wrote:I'll believe it when I see it. As other people have written, ACPS and Hutchings clearly felt pressure to follow the other districts. And after months and months of ACPS saying it was impossible, now they turn on a dime? LOL, OK.
Anonymous wrote:The tone of the meeting last night was way different than before. Unlike the doom and gloom, and excessive remedial man-splaining he excels at - Hutchings sounded optimistic that it was really going to happen this time. I'm guessing the political pressure got to him. The metrics he worships aren't actually that different from last week - and are certainly magnitudes worse than in the fall when none of this was "feasible".
He's an opportunistic jerk, who cares only about himself. I think he sees the writing on the wall and wants to get ahead of the "narrative" - which is basically the science shows schools are safe.
Whatever, I'll take it - my kids need to be in school - I just wish they didn't have to be in his school district.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised they would start back just before Spring Break. What grades/students are they proposing to return on 3/16?
All of them. (Special Ed and ELL would go back earlier).
Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised they would start back just before Spring Break. What grades/students are they proposing to return on 3/16?