Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some posters used people's actual names in the thread, which I disagree with and think they shouldn't do. Maybe that's why? I know they signed the editorial, but still. I wouldn't do that.
Why not? They signed the letter - both with their own names, and in their capacity as former and current PTAC officers, even though the PTAC did not approve or necessarily support the piece.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Some posters used people's actual names in the thread, which I disagree with and think they shouldn't do. Maybe that's why? I know they signed the editorial, but still. I wouldn't do that.
Why not? They signed the letter - both with their own names, and in their capacity as former and current PTAC officers, even though the PTAC did not approve or necessarily support the piece.
Some posters used people's actual names in the thread, which I disagree with and think they shouldn't do. Maybe that's why? I know they signed the editorial, but still. I wouldn't do that.
Anonymous wrote:This one? https://alextimes.com/2021/01/your-views-kudos-to-acps/?fbclid=IwAR0bX-F4XLcLSwdy3Wrm4ut9Ci__YcXrMu0vRCe4UTFYEKcQIwi1_Mf1VYM
It's still there.