If you do, there's nothing you can do about it, so tell your friend to buzz off.

Anonymous wrote:Kind of, but I think that's mostly a part of being overweight. It's not a "true" cankle where you would have it at 110 lbs and 5'6, more like legs just chunked up all over so lost some ankle definition.

Who at 5’6, 110 lbs has cankles? I’m similar, and I can wrap my fingers around my ankle, but my calves are much larger from weight lifting and run/bike/hike activities.

I’m a PP who doesn’t think OP has cankles. I know people with true cankles, front butts, and multiple chins. BMI’s 35-40+

I’d need a side view before making that determination.

No, you don’t have cankles - you have defined ankles.

No, I don’t think you have cankles. Overweight a little, but considering the average American is very overweight or obese, you don’t appear to be even above average in weight. I know people who do have cankles and they are 35 or 40+ BMI. Not only do they have cankles, it looks like they have a front butt and many chins.

I'm afraid so.

No, those aren’t cankles. There’s some fat over your ankles and calves so they’re not super defined/thin but your leg still narrows a lot at the ankle. Cankles are when there is almost no difference between the calf and ankle, and has little to do with overall body fat.

Kind of, but I think that's mostly a part of being overweight. It's not a "true" cankle where you would have it at 110 lbs and 5'6, more like legs just chunked up all over so lost some ankle definition.

You don’t, but you should lose that “friend” — a friend wouldn’t say that.

Yes you do. I don't see clean cut ankle definition.

No

Anonymous wrote:Your ankles look lovely to me! I’ve had cankles since I was a kid— I don’t think you do.

What do yours look like?

Your ankles look lovely to me! I’ve had cankles since I was a kid— I don’t think you do.

My friend said I did?