Anonymous wrote:I don't have any experience with Goddard, but my kids are at an elementary school that draws heavily from Goddard and other pre-K programs that bill themselves as being for kids who are "academically advanced."
Here's the thing I will say from the perspective of someone with older elementary kids - none of that matters. Yes, maybe your child enters kindergarten already reading chapter books and doing two-digit addition, but they still need to wait for the other kids to learn those skills.
Then, once the other kids learn those skills, the kids with natural aptitude sometimes outpace the kids who were just well-prepared.
Basically, choose that model if you think it is right for your child but don't think you are doing them any favors or getting them ahead of their peers. At best, you are helping them learn some stuff a little early. At worst, you are setting them to be bored while the public school curriculum repeats those skills for kids who didn't have the benefit of expensive pre-K.
Interesting point. My child finishes k curriculum, like how to read chapter books and doing two-digit addition that you mention above, before he graduates from Goddard and plans to attend kindergarten in public school in the fall. At one point, I was worried that he might be bored, and still need to wait for other kids to learn those skills. However, my child won’t have a normal kindergarten year even we go back in person learning. And, his comfidence level goes up by feeling “academically advanced” and I plan to continue to supplement on reading and math at home to keep him entertained. I thought someone tell me once that the most important things for kids to learn from kindergarten year are to follow classroom rules and social skills. My child has problem on these 2 areas, so he can concentrate to work on these 2 areas in his public kindergarten year if go in person. I don’t have to worry about his academic at least for k year.