Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. Busch at Reiter Hill handled my abnormal Pap and eventual LEEP procedure about 10 years ago. She was wonderful.
I'm still with the practice and expecting my first. They had already accounted for additional monitoring and potential treatment based on my prior history from my first appointment on. No issues so far, but I have complete trust in them.
Can you update after birth, if you ended up with failure to progress and had to have a csection? Wondering if women who have had LEEP and other procedures that freeze parts of the cervix have the same outcome with failure to progress leading to a csection.
I'm still several months out but I will try to remember. The biggest concern they've expressed to me post-LEEP is the potential for cervical incompetence. It just meant I had to go for additional ultrasounds from 16 weeks until viability at 24 weeks to measure my cervix.
PP here. I delivered and wanted to update.
My water ended up breaking at exactly 36 weeks (PPROM), I was scheduled for induction at 37 weeks due to development of gestational hypertension at 35 weeks. My labor progressed naturally for about 16 hours until I started showing signs of preeclampsia at which time I was induced. I was ready to push 9 hours after induction and baby was born within 1.5 hours. Despite being 36 weeks, my baby was born healthy and didn’t require
NICU time.
I did ask my doctors about my water breaking and they said it is not unusual in LEEP recipients to have their waters break a little early. But the development of hypertension could have been a factor as well.
Hope this eases your mind in some way.
Anonymous wrote:Count me as another and I had a successful homebirth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. Busch at Reiter Hill handled my abnormal Pap and eventual LEEP procedure about 10 years ago. She was wonderful.
I'm still with the practice and expecting my first. They had already accounted for additional monitoring and potential treatment based on my prior history from my first appointment on. No issues so far, but I have complete trust in them.
Can you update after birth, if you ended up with failure to progress and had to have a csection? Wondering if women who have had LEEP and other procedures that freeze parts of the cervix have the same outcome with failure to progress leading to a csection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. Busch at Reiter Hill handled my abnormal Pap and eventual LEEP procedure about 10 years ago. She was wonderful.
I'm still with the practice and expecting my first. They had already accounted for additional monitoring and potential treatment based on my prior history from my first appointment on. No issues so far, but I have complete trust in them.
Can you update after birth, if you ended up with failure to progress and had to have a csection? Wondering if women who have had LEEP and other procedures that freeze parts of the cervix have the same outcome with failure to progress leading to a csection.
I'm still several months out but I will try to remember. The biggest concern they've expressed to me post-LEEP is the potential for cervical incompetence. It just meant I had to go for additional ultrasounds from 16 weeks until viability at 24 weeks to measure my cervix.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dr. Busch at Reiter Hill handled my abnormal Pap and eventual LEEP procedure about 10 years ago. She was wonderful.
I'm still with the practice and expecting my first. They had already accounted for additional monitoring and potential treatment based on my prior history from my first appointment on. No issues so far, but I have complete trust in them.
Can you update after birth, if you ended up with failure to progress and had to have a csection? Wondering if women who have had LEEP and other procedures that freeze parts of the cervix have the same outcome with failure to progress leading to a csection.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. Busch at Reiter Hill handled my abnormal Pap and eventual LEEP procedure about 10 years ago. She was wonderful.
I'm still with the practice and expecting my first. They had already accounted for additional monitoring and potential treatment based on my prior history from my first appointment on. No issues so far, but I have complete trust in them.