Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know, but I think it has less to do with them being "a model" and more to do with being a school with a large population of UMC, highly educated parents, and an extremely well-funded PTO. What Brent is doing is simply not possible at other schools, and it actually just highlights the inequities in the system. Brent is also not a destination school for children from less well-funded or well-functioning IBs, since it is virtually impossible to get a spot at Brent unless you are IB. So another example of how the lottery does not actually distribute resources equally among the city's kids, but allows wealthy families to buy into "good" schools that exclude poor children.
Side note: a Brent parent once told me that "any school" could be like Brent if the parents just put in the effort. So if you are wondering if UMC white people still think their sh*t don't stink, the answer is very much: YES.
Well extremely similar schools are not doing this mere blocks away (Maury) so I think there's something different going on at Brent.
Also I'm not sure why you think Brent is doing something no other school could replicate?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it also depends on what parents within the school want. I know that most of the UMC parents at our elementary do NOT want in person schooling.
And I only singled UMC out because they seem to be the group that typically most want in person. I spoke with a person on our schools' LSAT who told me that they had done surveys and no parents wanted in-person at our school. The only reason we have one CARES class because Bowser required it.
Anonymous wrote:I think it also depends on what parents within the school want. I know that most of the UMC parents at our elementary do NOT want in person schooling.
Anonymous wrote:I think it also depends on what parents within the school want. I know that most of the UMC parents at our elementary do NOT want in person schooling.
Anonymous wrote:I think in general this "every school for itself" plan is going to mean inperson schooling will hinge on the reputation and relationship between the principal and the teachers. This will be where the rubber meets the road.
Good luck to the schools with principals none of the teachers can stand.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know, but I think it has less to do with them being "a model" and more to do with being a school with a large population of UMC, highly educated parents, and an extremely well-funded PTO. What Brent is doing is simply not possible at other schools, and it actually just highlights the inequities in the system. Brent is also not a destination school for children from less well-funded or well-functioning IBs, since it is virtually impossible to get a spot at Brent unless you are IB. So another example of how the lottery does not actually distribute resources equally among the city's kids, but allows wealthy families to buy into "good" schools that exclude poor children.
Side note: a Brent parent once told me that "any school" could be like Brent if the parents just put in the effort. So if you are wondering if UMC white people still think their sh*t don't stink, the answer is very much: YES.
Anonymous wrote:If Brent can do it, why can't all the NW schools do it?