Anonymous wrote:I've been on another parenting forum where multiple posters have brought up CPS investigations they have gone through that later were dropped because the claims were unsubstantiated. A random scratch on an the child's ear that the pediatrician called CPS for, a journal entry in Kindergarten where a child wrote "I hate when my dad beats me" (that, after she was removed from the home, turned out to be about beating her at board games), and so many stories of random things children said at daycare that were taken out of context.
These stories have rocked me to my core. Of course I understand that it's best to be cautious but some of these stories involved the children being taken away for a week or more during the investigation... it's horrible! Has anything like this ever happened to you?
Anonymous wrote:These are not common situations. Far more common that children who should be removed aren’t and have to stay in an abusive or neglectful situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of people have had this... Its stressful but ultimately necessary to have such a system
No, it is not necessary to have a system with a hair-trigger for removing kids from the home.
In answer to your question OP - I knew someone who had a false Shaken Baby accusation made against them. Preemie twins, one had a brain bleed at home that is common in prematurity. The ER doctor saw this as a per se sign of child abuse and referred to CPS. This was a wealthy, professional family. Thankfully they had the resources to fight this, and the babies were never removed from the home to fostercare. I think the babies went to the grandparents, and one parent (the one who was not home at the time of the brain bleed) was allowed visitation. Once it was sorted out, the family literally left the US to never return because it was so scarring.
I knew a family who, when putting the baby to bed one night, found a bump on the back of his head. Took the child to the ER and the doctor called CPS immediately. They took the child into protective custody for two weeks. They were all interviewed and it turned out the nanny dropped the baby and never told the parents. That family, especially the mother, was traumatized. She quit her job to be a SAHM and they never had another kid. It's awful
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of people have had this... Its stressful but ultimately necessary to have such a system
No, it is not necessary to have a system with a hair-trigger for removing kids from the home.
In answer to your question OP - I knew someone who had a false Shaken Baby accusation made against them. Preemie twins, one had a brain bleed at home that is common in prematurity. The ER doctor saw this as a per se sign of child abuse and referred to CPS. This was a wealthy, professional family. Thankfully they had the resources to fight this, and the babies were never removed from the home to fostercare. I think the babies went to the grandparents, and one parent (the one who was not home at the time of the brain bleed) was allowed visitation. Once it was sorted out, the family literally left the US to never return because it was so scarring.
I knew a family who, when putting the baby to bed one night, found a bump on the back of his head. Took the child to the ER and the doctor called CPS immediately. They took the child into protective custody for two weeks. They were all interviewed and it turned out the nanny dropped the baby and never told the parents. That family, especially the mother, was traumatized. She quit her job to be a SAHM and they never had another kid. It's awful
You are writing pure fantasy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of people have had this... Its stressful but ultimately necessary to have such a system
No, it is not necessary to have a system with a hair-trigger for removing kids from the home.
In answer to your question OP - I knew someone who had a false Shaken Baby accusation made against them. Preemie twins, one had a brain bleed at home that is common in prematurity. The ER doctor saw this as a per se sign of child abuse and referred to CPS. This was a wealthy, professional family. Thankfully they had the resources to fight this, and the babies were never removed from the home to fostercare. I think the babies went to the grandparents, and one parent (the one who was not home at the time of the brain bleed) was allowed visitation. Once it was sorted out, the family literally left the US to never return because it was so scarring.
I knew a family who, when putting the baby to bed one night, found a bump on the back of his head. Took the child to the ER and the doctor called CPS immediately. They took the child into protective custody for two weeks. They were all interviewed and it turned out the nanny dropped the baby and never told the parents. That family, especially the mother, was traumatized. She quit her job to be a SAHM and they never had another kid. It's awful
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of people have had this... Its stressful but ultimately necessary to have such a system
No, it is not necessary to have a system with a hair-trigger for removing kids from the home.
In answer to your question OP - I knew someone who had a false Shaken Baby accusation made against them. Preemie twins, one had a brain bleed at home that is common in prematurity. The ER doctor saw this as a per se sign of child abuse and referred to CPS. This was a wealthy, professional family. Thankfully they had the resources to fight this, and the babies were never removed from the home to fostercare. I think the babies went to the grandparents, and one parent (the one who was not home at the time of the brain bleed) was allowed visitation. Once it was sorted out, the family literally left the US to never return because it was so scarring.

Anonymous wrote:Lots of people have had this... Its stressful but ultimately necessary to have such a system