Anonymous wrote:I think it is selfish on the part of the parents. I think siblings should all have the same last name. I didn't want to change my last name so I changed my middle name to my husband's last name. The common name unites us and helps identify us as a family to others. It makes life easier if I have to go pick up a package for him, if we are traveling, etc.
Anonymous wrote:In what situation would the older child and father have the same last name and the younger child and mom have the same last name?
The parents are married. I totally get the mom not having the same last name as the husband and kids. I kept my maiden name for years. I just thought it was odd when half the kids had the dad’s name and not the other child.
This family doesn’t appear like a blended family but I guess they could all be the same race and siblings just look really alike.
Anonymous wrote:In what situation would the older child and father have the same last name and the younger child and mom have the same last name?
The parents are married. I totally get the mom not having the same last name as the husband and kids. I kept my maiden name for years. I just thought it was odd when half the kids had the dad’s name and not the other child.
This family doesn’t appear like a blended family but I guess they could all be the same race and siblings just look really alike.
Anonymous wrote:In what situation would the older child and father have the same last name and the younger child and mom have the same last name?
The parents are married. I totally get the mom not having the same last name as the husband and kids. I kept my maiden name for years. I just thought it was odd when half the kids had the dad’s name and not the other child.
This family doesn’t appear like a blended family but I guess they could all be the same race and siblings just look really alike.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know you're allowed to give a child the mother's last name. And siblings (even full siblings) aren't required to share a last name. In fact, no one is required to share a last name! The parents and siblings could all have different names.
OP, I'm assuming the parents wanted both of their names to continue into the next generation. Or they wanted to be equally represented in their kids. So that's what they did. (PS - I know twins that have this feature...one with each of the parents' last names.)
This would be my assumption too.
Although if the older kid had mom's last name, and the younger child had dad's last name, my assumption would be that the older child was from a previous relationship.
Anonymous wrote:You know you're allowed to give a child the mother's last name. And siblings (even full siblings) aren't required to share a last name. In fact, no one is required to share a last name! The parents and siblings could all have different names.
OP, I'm assuming the parents wanted both of their names to continue into the next generation. Or they wanted to be equally represented in their kids. So that's what they did. (PS - I know twins that have this feature...one with each of the parents' last names.)
Anonymous wrote:You know you're allowed to give a child the mother's last name. And siblings (even full siblings) aren't required to share a last name. In fact, no one is required to share a last name! The parents and siblings could all have different names.
OP, I'm assuming the parents wanted both of their names to continue into the next generation. Or they wanted to be equally represented in their kids. So that's what they did. (PS - I know twins that have this feature...one with each of the parents' last names.)