Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Publications that are heavily pay walled shouldn't be able to endlessly spam their clickbait / headlines into things like the FB news viewer. It's really that simple. I will pay for one publication. I will not pay for 15 of them.
Yep, this is my problem with newspaper paywalls. In digital form, I think many people find articles to read from social media, blogs and new aggregators. It's not like a physical paper, where you might sit down and page through the whole newspaper.
I think people are willing to pay for news, but it's going to need to work more like Spotify than traditional newspaper subscriptions.
Anonymous wrote:Publications that are heavily pay walled shouldn't be able to endlessly spam their clickbait / headlines into things like the FB news viewer. It's really that simple. I will pay for one publication. I will not pay for 15 of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsmith123 wrote:People are just accustomed to getting online services for free. And there are several "news" services out there that are ad supported or have other financial models.
I wish people would just pay for good journalism. It would probably reduce click bait.
+1
A reminder that if you aren't paying, you're the product. People get mad that articles are behind paywalls, but they also complain about the quality of contemporary journalism. Good journalism, the kind that requires investigation and fact-checking and in-depth knowledge -- costs money to produce. I'd rather pay for a subscription to have access to that kind of work, that just get the free clickbait.
Newspapers have always made the bulk of their profit from advertising, not from paid subscriptions.
Seems kind of silly for me to pay to see ads.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsmith123 wrote:People are just accustomed to getting online services for free. And there are several "news" services out there that are ad supported or have other financial models.
I wish people would just pay for good journalism. It would probably reduce click bait.
+1
A reminder that if you aren't paying, you're the product. People get mad that articles are behind paywalls, but they also complain about the quality of contemporary journalism. Good journalism, the kind that requires investigation and fact-checking and in-depth knowledge -- costs money to produce. I'd rather pay for a subscription to have access to that kind of work, that just get the free clickbait.
Agree 100%. I happily pay for the Post. People refusing to pay for good journalism is one of the things that nearly killed the whole industry!
Anonymous wrote:jsmith123 wrote:People are just accustomed to getting online services for free. And there are several "news" services out there that are ad supported or have other financial models.
I wish people would just pay for good journalism. It would probably reduce click bait.
+1
A reminder that if you aren't paying, you're the product. People get mad that articles are behind paywalls, but they also complain about the quality of contemporary journalism. Good journalism, the kind that requires investigation and fact-checking and in-depth knowledge -- costs money to produce. I'd rather pay for a subscription to have access to that kind of work, that just get the free clickbait.
Anonymous wrote:I don't get a home delivery. But for some reason when I get a newspaper I read it front to back. Online is just weird to me, much prefer the physical paper.
Anonymous wrote:jsmith123 wrote:People are just accustomed to getting online services for free. And there are several "news" services out there that are ad supported or have other financial models.
I wish people would just pay for good journalism. It would probably reduce click bait.
+1
A reminder that if you aren't paying, you're the product. People get mad that articles are behind paywalls, but they also complain about the quality of contemporary journalism. Good journalism, the kind that requires investigation and fact-checking and in-depth knowledge -- costs money to produce. I'd rather pay for a subscription to have access to that kind of work, that just get the free clickbait.
jsmith123 wrote:People are just accustomed to getting online services for free. And there are several "news" services out there that are ad supported or have other financial models.
I wish people would just pay for good journalism. It would probably reduce click bait.