Anonymous wrote:Now they'll devise a plan designed to increase URM in a more targeted manner, while still maintaining high merit-based academic standards.
Anonymous wrote:They can skip the test this year and blame covid.
Hope they can use a holistic approach to get more URMs in.
I was very against the lottery. I am not against getting more URMs in. I hope they can capture more of them this year for AAP. Again since there is no cogat, they can use other methods of picking the students.
Anonymous wrote:Is it off the table? I thought the board just asked the Superintendent to come back with a plan without lottery and a plan with lottery.
As flawed as their testing situation was, now that a test is removed from the process, who are we going to trust to evaluate the applicants aptitudes in an o justice way? Certainly not these unprepared people who couldn't answer a few basic questions about their proposal. They can give whatever aptitude scores they want to whomever they want. I want full transparency into the process, and how they will guarantee equity in evaluations. The words "holistic review" seem to be code here (in this case) for "we'll fudge where we can"
Anonymous wrote:Is it off the table? I thought the board just asked the Superintendent to come back with a plan without lottery and a plan with lottery.
As flawed as their testing situation was, now that a test is removed from the process, who are we going to trust to evaluate the applicants aptitudes in an o justice way? Certainly not these unprepared people who couldn't answer a few basic questions about their proposal. They can give whatever aptitude scores they want to whomever they want. I want full transparency into the process, and how they will guarantee equity in evaluations. The words "holistic review" seem to be code here (in this case) for "we'll fudge where we can"
Anonymous wrote:Now they'll devise a plan designed to increase URM in a more targeted manner, while still maintaining high merit-based academic standards.