Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best does not necessarily = most selective.
And most selective does not necessarily = lowest acceptance rates.
wut? how come?
Many colleges entice large numbers of students to apply to boost their rankings and/or get application fees. Tulane is a great example of this. My daughter got AT LEAST 2 emails every week for a year from them plus many postcards in the mail. Indeed, their acceptance rate is only 12%. But that doesn't mean much because you don't know what their applicant pool is like. They are notorious for getting low stat/unrealistic applicants to apply just to reject them. Selectivity of the candidate pool is the first and most important factor. You can have a rock bottom acceptance rate but if it’s from a mediocre candidate pool, then your results will still be mediocre.
Limestone University, Ottawa University in Kansas, and Jarvis Christian College have lower acceptance rates (14%) than Tufts (15%), UVA (24%), and Notre Dame (16%). That doesn't mean they're better schools or more selective. Their applicant pool is probably just bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best does not necessarily = most selective.
And most selective does not necessarily = lowest acceptance rates.
wut? how come?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Best does not necessarily = most selective.
And most selective does not necessarily = lowest acceptance rates.
Anonymous wrote:Best does not necessarily = most selective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UCLA is better school than USC. But it’s a public so. UCB is better school than UCLA if that matters.
USC acceptance rate is 9% while UCLA/UCB are both around 35%. Michigan is at 45% so isn't really in the conversation.
USC 11% https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=university+of+southern+california&s=all&id=123961
UCLA 12% https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=ucla&s=all&id=110662#admsns
UCB 16% https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=uc+berkeley&s=all&id=110635#admsns
UMich 23% https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/?q=u+michigan&s=all&pg=2&id=170976#admsns
(I'm no fan of any of them, but it's better to be clear about data and where you are getting it...)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UCLA is better school than USC. But it’s a public so. UCB is better school than UCLA if that matters.
USC acceptance rate is 9% while UCLA/UCB are both around 35%. Michigan is at 45% so isn't really in the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UCLA is better school than USC. But it’s a public so. UCB is better school than UCLA if that matters.
USC acceptance rate is 9% while UCLA/UCB are both around 35%. Michigan is at 45% so isn't really in the conversation.
Anonymous wrote:UCLA is better school than USC. But it’s a public so. UCB is better school than UCLA if that matters.