Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, this doesn’t mean you should get back together.
It means you all will be able to co parent and remain distant friends.
Win!
Op here, thanks and this is what I suspect. Another poster said it's because the pressure if intimacy is gone and I think that's true too. It was a major source of stress, she stopped wanting to be intimate.
She suggests we slow down the divorce process and asked about how I feel about us doing better. She wants to keep reconciliation on the table but this is all good advice and in fact a hopeful sign we will be great peaceful coparents
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not reimagine living arrangements? Why not consider if intimacy COULD be back on the table, but you both live in separate houses? I'd say keep an open mind here. You can love and be in love but not like to actually LIVE with somebody.
OP here, I have thought about that at length. Can the separate living arraignments also mean an open marriage or perhaps neither of us ask what the other is doing? We don't have sex anyway. Is this a fantasy? Or do you think she would actually want to have a sex life again if we created space between us?
I don't know, OP, but you should definitely broach those subjects with her ... I think it may save your marriage and so when you get older (and want/need less sex) you may want more togetherness (because I can see the benefits of being with a known entity who legitimately cares about me as I age).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, this doesn’t mean you should get back together.
It means you all will be able to co parent and remain distant friends.
Win!
Op here, thanks and this is what I suspect. Another poster said it's because the pressure if intimacy is gone and I think that's true too. It was a major source of stress, she stopped wanting to be intimate.
She suggests we slow down the divorce process and asked about how I feel about us doing better. She wants to keep reconciliation on the table but this is all good advice and in fact a hopeful sign we will be great peaceful coparents
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not reimagine living arrangements? Why not consider if intimacy COULD be back on the table, but you both live in separate houses? I'd say keep an open mind here. You can love and be in love but not like to actually LIVE with somebody.
OP here, I have thought about that at length. Can the separate living arraignments also mean an open marriage or perhaps neither of us ask what the other is doing? We don't have sex anyway. Is this a fantasy? Or do you think she would actually want to have a sex life again if we created space between us?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why not reimagine living arrangements? Why not consider if intimacy COULD be back on the table, but you both live in separate houses? I'd say keep an open mind here. You can love and be in love but not like to actually LIVE with somebody.
OP here, I have thought about that at length. Can the separate living arraignments also mean an open marriage or perhaps neither of us ask what the other is doing? We don't have sex anyway. Is this a fantasy? Or do you think she would actually want to have a sex life again if we created space between us?
Anonymous wrote:Why not reimagine living arrangements? Why not consider if intimacy COULD be back on the table, but you both live in separate houses? I'd say keep an open mind here. You can love and be in love but not like to actually LIVE with somebody.
Anonymous wrote:No, this doesn’t mean you should get back together.
It means you all will be able to co parent and remain distant friends.
Win!