Anonymous wrote:“ I think it should be a school that fosters STEM kids who are high performing rather than only the ones who are top 1 percent. ”
I would like this too - and would be much more apt to encourage DCs to shoot for applying rather than under the current pressure grinder atmosphere.
Anonymous wrote:I think it'll totally ruin the school.
And by lowering admission standards, now you have a lot of kids of any race there who previously wouldn't have been admitted. What happens when they can't keep up with the rigor? Do the teachers have to dumb down the material? Do they drop out? My oldest is 4 so I have no skin in the game but I'd argue kids failing out of TJ would do more harm than any benefit received from a more diverse population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it will increase URM enrollment. I think there is a much better chance of having socioeconomic diversity at the school under the new proposal, which will make some kids more comfortable applying. I also feel like there's currently a perception (for the right or wrong of it) that TJ is full of kids who have been prepping for years and who continue to have tutors/Saturday school throughout high school. Many kids, even those who are hard workers, don't want to be in that environment. The lottery will help to get rid of that perception and more kids (of all races) might be comfortable applying. The new proposal will change the culture of the school and broaden the types of students it serves. That's good for some and bad for others. I don't think overall gifted URMs tend to apply to TJ under the current system and I don't know whether they'll apply under the new system.
My DS's best friend when he was at TJ is an URM and the most impressive person I've ever known of any race. I have no doubt that he breezed through the admissions process on his own merits. With a lottery, he would have just been one of thousands of hopefuls vying for 70 spots in his region. Your response takes such a cavalier attitude towards kids like him. It's like you're saying "Oh, well, too bad for kids like him. Suck it up."
Anonymous wrote:The way I see it, the current holistic process yields an exceptionally strong student body which results in the #1 school in America. We shouldn't just throw the entire process away because it's not perfect. We should just tweak it to achieve the desired results. The problem is lack of diversity, right? Why don't we do the current admissions process to identify the first 300 or so admittees. Then, assess the racial composition of that group, and then make the remaining selections with an eye toward balancing out the racial composition. At least this way there's more of a chance that we'll capture those prodigies out there who really need a school like TJ. If there's a legal issue with taking race into account, then we could just hold a lottery for the applicants who didn't make the first cut.
Anonymous wrote:I think it will increase URM enrollment. I think there is a much better chance of having socioeconomic diversity at the school under the new proposal, which will make some kids more comfortable applying. I also feel like there's currently a perception (for the right or wrong of it) that TJ is full of kids who have been prepping for years and who continue to have tutors/Saturday school throughout high school. Many kids, even those who are hard workers, don't want to be in that environment. The lottery will help to get rid of that perception and more kids (of all races) might be comfortable applying. The new proposal will change the culture of the school and broaden the types of students it serves. That's good for some and bad for others. I don't think overall gifted URMs tend to apply to TJ under the current system and I don't know whether they'll apply under the new system.
Anonymous wrote:The way I see it, the current holistic process yields an exceptionally strong student body which results in the #1 school in America. We shouldn't just throw the entire process away because it's not perfect. We should just tweak it to achieve the desired results. The problem is lack of diversity, right? Why don't we do the current admissions process to identify the first 300 or so admittees. Then, assess the racial composition of that group, and then make the remaining selections with an eye toward balancing out the racial composition. At least this way there's more of a chance that we'll capture those prodigies out there who really need a school like TJ. If there's a legal issue with taking race into account, then we could just hold a lottery for the applicants who didn't make the first cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I predict not. I believe the root of the issue is lack of interest, so a lottery, or even an open admissions policy, won't fix that.
I wholeheartedly agree. The tragedy of it all is that the gifted URM who actually wants to go, and who had a decent chance of getting in before, will have less of a chance to get in under the lottery system.
Anonymous wrote:I predict not. I believe the root of the issue is lack of interest, so a lottery, or even an open admissions policy, won't fix that.