Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would he need them to open? Kids sign their leases months in advance. Whether they open or not, landlords get their rent.
Very large % of kids and families would not pay for 12 months of an apartment they don't use. Is a billionaire university trustee going to sic bill collectors and lawsuits on 1,000s of university students? The increase in late-minute apartment leases alone probably covered that $30M gift.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would he need them to open? Kids sign their leases months in advance. Whether they open or not, landlords get their rent.
Very large % of kids and families would not pay for 12 months of an apartment they don't use. Is a billionaire university trustee going to sic bill collectors and lawsuits on 1,000s of university students? The increase in late-minute apartment leases alone probably covered that $30M gift.
Anonymous wrote:Not really seeing this one
If campus remained empty, wouldn't that hurt smaller landlords, allowing him to gobble up even more properties at depressed prices? A billionaire like this basically finds ways to make money somehow no matter what.
Anonymous wrote:Why would he need them to open? Kids sign their leases months in advance. Whether they open or not, landlords get their rent.
Why the push to reopen the campus? According to a Michigan Daily op-ed published last week written by a U-M staffer who was granted anonymity in exchange for candor, the University's decision was guided by one of Ann Arbor's biggest landlords.
When the decision to reopen the school was made, U-M's Board of Regents was chaired by Ron Weiser, a billionaire megadonor of President Donald Trump. Of course, as a landlord, if the Ann Arbor campus was closed, Weiser would take a huge financial hit.
It gets worse. According to the anonymous op-ed writer, Weiser donated more than $100 million to the school in recent years — including a $30 million gift in the days ahead of U-M's decision to reopen. The writer calls this "one of the biggest conflicts of interest imaginable between public health and private wealth."