Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with pp. Now everyone has a Council member that represents them plus a couple at large members. This would mean one person only.
The money behind the group pushing for this are Republicans and Developers (please don't, we'd like to KEEP the Ag Reserve!)
The problem is that if most of the At Large members are from one area, then it's a lopsided representation. And not everything thinks the Ag Reserve needs to be kept the way it is.
Why is that a problem? Those are the candidates who got the most votes. If candidates from Clarksburg or Germantown or Potomac were able to persuade enough voters to vote for them, then they would get elected. There's nothing magical, or cheating, about living in Silver Spring. Nine Districts For MoCo is saying, "Well, I can't win under these rules, therefore these rules must be changed so that I can win."
Indeed it's true that not everybody wants to keep the Ag Reserve the way it is. Developers, for example, would love to be able to build subdivisions in the Ag Reserve. Which is why they're helping to fund the campaign.
I mean clearly it’s not a problem if you live in Silver Spring or Takoma Park. If you live in less populous areas, it’s hard to overcome their votes. This is the whole reason we have an electoral college.
You assume that people are voting for candidates on the basis of "I live in Silver Spring and so do they, I will vote for them." That's ridiculous. Instead of whining and trying to change the rules, candidates from the upcounty or west county could try (1) broadening their message to appeal to non-upcounty/west county voters and (2) getting people in the upcounty to vote. Unlike the electoral college, that's how democracy is supposed to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with pp. Now everyone has a Council member that represents them plus a couple at large members. This would mean one person only.
The money behind the group pushing for this are Republicans and Developers (please don't, we'd like to KEEP the Ag Reserve!)
The problem is that if most of the At Large members are from one area, then it's a lopsided representation. And not everything thinks the Ag Reserve needs to be kept the way it is.
Why is that a problem? Those are the candidates who got the most votes. If candidates from Clarksburg or Germantown or Potomac were able to persuade enough voters to vote for them, then they would get elected. There's nothing magical, or cheating, about living in Silver Spring. Nine Districts For MoCo is saying, "Well, I can't win under these rules, therefore these rules must be changed so that I can win."
Indeed it's true that not everybody wants to keep the Ag Reserve the way it is. Developers, for example, would love to be able to build subdivisions in the Ag Reserve. Which is why they're helping to fund the campaign.
I mean clearly it’s not a problem if you live in Silver Spring or Takoma Park. If you live in less populous areas, it’s hard to overcome their votes. This is the whole reason we have an electoral college.
Anonymous wrote:Montgomery county is so large that I do think each region should have its own representative. Most of the current counsel lives in Takoma Park and I feel that although they have good intentions, they don’t truly understand or able to advocate for what is best for my area. The needs of my area are the same as the needs for the close in suburbs and that’s just a fact. Politically I don’t understand what the repercussions would be for having nine districts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with pp. Now everyone has a Council member that represents them plus a couple at large members. This would mean one person only.
The money behind the group pushing for this are Republicans and Developers (please don't, we'd like to KEEP the Ag Reserve!)
The problem is that if most of the At Large members are from one area, then it's a lopsided representation. And not everything thinks the Ag Reserve needs to be kept the way it is.
Why is that a problem? Those are the candidates who got the most votes. If candidates from Clarksburg or Germantown or Potomac were able to persuade enough voters to vote for them, then they would get elected. There's nothing magical, or cheating, about living in Silver Spring. Nine Districts For MoCo is saying, "Well, I can't win under these rules, therefore these rules must be changed so that I can win."
Indeed it's true that not everybody wants to keep the Ag Reserve the way it is. Developers, for example, would love to be able to build subdivisions in the Ag Reserve. Which is why they're helping to fund the campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with pp. Now everyone has a Council member that represents them plus a couple at large members. This would mean one person only.
The money behind the group pushing for this are Republicans and Developers (please don't, we'd like to KEEP the Ag Reserve!)
The problem is that if most of the At Large members are from one area, then it's a lopsided representation. And not everything thinks the Ag Reserve needs to be kept the way it is.
Anonymous wrote:Must council members live in the district they represent? It seems like a lot of them live in Takoma Park at the moment so might make more sense to get a better geographic spread.
Having said that, I have a lot of time for Hans Reimer, who is an at large member.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with pp. Now everyone has a Council member that represents them plus a couple at large members. This would mean one person only.
The money behind the group pushing for this are Republicans and Developers (please don't, we'd like to KEEP the Ag Reserve!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If there’s already an existing thread please let me know.
I’m curious, if you’re strongly for or agains nine districts for moco could you explain why? I’m trying to understand the implication of this structure switch to figure out whether I support.
Why should be 9 district? Each member will represent one district? If that is the case, I am for it. I heard at one of the hearing that the citizen has to contact their own rep before they can reach to the at large members. If this is true, I don't think we need the at large members. Allmenbers should work for all citizens in the county.
Anonymous wrote:If there’s already an existing thread please let me know.
I’m curious, if you’re strongly for or agains nine districts for moco could you explain why? I’m trying to understand the implication of this structure switch to figure out whether I support.
Anonymous wrote:If there’s already an existing thread please let me know.
I’m curious, if you’re strongly for or agains nine districts for moco could you explain why? I’m trying to understand the implication of this structure switch to figure out whether I support.