Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An '04 boy tested positive a day after a scrimmage with another Arlington '05 team. The club notified both teams and both teams have been quarantined from all practices, training, scrimmages and games. Neither team is playing in games for 2 weeks. The club has acted very responsibly.
The encouraging news is, no other players on either team have had symptoms or tested positive. This would actually be very good news, as to the low transmission rate through a soccer match.
That sounds very responsible and reasonable. Good for them!
That does sound good. Trying to imagine a scenario, though, in which my kid would play in a scrimmage one day and then get a test the next day. Symptoms first appear the next day and parents hustle the kid right out the door for a test after an hour or two of fever? (Seems unlikely.) Or if the kid was waiting for results (and received them the day after the scrimmage, rather than being tested the day after the scrimmage), the kid should not have been playing while waiting.
I have no idea what happened. But how do you know he did play? My assumption would be that he likely didn't play but that both teams were quarantined anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An '04 boy tested positive a day after a scrimmage with another Arlington '05 team. The club notified both teams and both teams have been quarantined from all practices, training, scrimmages and games. Neither team is playing in games for 2 weeks. The club has acted very responsibly.
The encouraging news is, no other players on either team have had symptoms or tested positive. This would actually be very good news, as to the low transmission rate through a soccer match.
That sounds very responsible and reasonable. Good for them!
That does sound good. Trying to imagine a scenario, though, in which my kid would play in a scrimmage one day and then get a test the next day. Symptoms first appear the next day and parents hustle the kid right out the door for a test after an hour or two of fever? (Seems unlikely.) Or if the kid was waiting for results (and received them the day after the scrimmage, rather than being tested the day after the scrimmage), the kid should not have been playing while waiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An '04 boy tested positive a day after a scrimmage with another Arlington '05 team. The club notified both teams and both teams have been quarantined from all practices, training, scrimmages and games. Neither team is playing in games for 2 weeks. The club has acted very responsibly.
The encouraging news is, no other players on either team have had symptoms or tested positive. This would actually be very good news, as to the low transmission rate through a soccer match.
That sounds very responsible and reasonable. Good for them!
That does sound good. Trying to imagine a scenario, though, in which my kid would play in a scrimmage one day and then get a test the next day. Symptoms first appear the next day and parents hustle the kid right out the door for a test after an hour or two of fever? (Seems unlikely.) Or if the kid was waiting for results (and received them the day after the scrimmage, rather than being tested the day after the scrimmage), the kid should not have been playing while waiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An '04 boy tested positive a day after a scrimmage with another Arlington '05 team. The club notified both teams and both teams have been quarantined from all practices, training, scrimmages and games. Neither team is playing in games for 2 weeks. The club has acted very responsibly.
The encouraging news is, no other players on either team have had symptoms or tested positive. This would actually be very good news, as to the low transmission rate through a soccer match.
That sounds very responsible and reasonable. Good for them!
Anonymous wrote:An '04 boy tested positive a day after a scrimmage with another Arlington '05 team. The club notified both teams and both teams have been quarantined from all practices, training, scrimmages and games. Neither team is playing in games for 2 weeks. The club has acted very responsibly.
The encouraging news is, no other players on either team have had symptoms or tested positive. This would actually be very good news, as to the low transmission rate through a soccer match.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a game with an Arlington girls team this weekend. I know they have a lot of teams but I hope they are talking to our club.
I am sure this happen to other clubs. They are all scrimmaging each other.
Just because a kid on a soccer team has COVID does not mean they got it from playing a an outdoor soccer game.
I think the point is that if your club has a positive case in Team 1A that they should let recent and upcoming opponents of Team 1A
Know if that positive. Not identify the kid(s). But allow others who may be at risk to properly know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We have a game with an Arlington girls team this weekend. I know they have a lot of teams but I hope they are talking to our club.
I am sure this happen to other clubs. They are all scrimmaging each other.
Just because a kid on a soccer team has COVID does not mean they got it from playing a an outdoor soccer game.
Anonymous wrote:We have a game with an Arlington girls team this weekend. I know they have a lot of teams but I hope they are talking to our club.
I am sure this happen to other clubs. They are all scrimmaging each other.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds troll like. The club would have notified you.
Anonymous wrote:This sounds troll like. The club would have notified you.