Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1st child. Autism. They tend to be firstborns because the firstborn child gets 2/3 of the mother's toxic burden
There are conflicting studies on this, as a quick search will show. No one here can add additional information to that.
If this was even remotely true, 80% of the world's special needs kids would be coming out of China over the past 10 years given the insane pollutants they are breathing in every single day. But we can obviously see it's not true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1st child. Autism. They tend to be firstborns because the firstborn child gets 2/3 of the mother's toxic burden
There are conflicting studies on this, as a quick search will show. No one here can add additional information to that.
Anonymous wrote:1st child. Autism. They tend to be firstborns because the firstborn child gets 2/3 of the mother's toxic burden
Anonymous wrote:It doesn't matter. I'm a developmental psychologist and birth order doesn't matter.
Now older parents do matter so kids that are last and parents are around 40 matters but other than that, it doesn't matter.
Anonymous wrote:All my kids are SN. Nothing I could have screened for or prevented.
If you can’t handle the thought of one, don’t have kids.
Anonymous wrote:What is the birth order of your special needs kid, and did the impact whether you chose to have more kids?