Anonymous wrote:Wait, who is getting defensive?
I'll bite. I love that my kids won't have to sit for a zoom call for hours and that they'll get to participate in small groups. But nothing about this is easy. I'm a working parent with no plans to hire outside help. The only way this will be easier is if they went back to school. Until then, we'll do the best we can.
Anonymous wrote:I'm unhappy with the (initial) plan I saw for my dcps school because it looks like WAY too much screen time. But I know that from talking to other parents that some people basically want their child to be engaged via the screen all day. I wish that the schools could offer a few different options (i.e. low screen for those of us who want that, high screen for people who prefer that), but I know that logistically that may not be possible.
Anonymous wrote:Should the school be building the schedule around what's best for the students or what's the for you and your work schedule? What's your solution? Cramming all the live sessions into the morning? Wouldn't the students just get burnt out?
Is your charter requiring attendance at all of the sessions? If not, why not just do what you can? The schools are in no-win situation. Making you happy is probably going to tick off someone else.
What's your IB doing? If you're really unhappy, just vote with your feet and go to your IB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you unhappy?
Because the in-person learning time (where the kids will be online with their teachers) are spread across the entire day with lots of weird chunky gaps. I like that they won't be online for 2 hours with up to 30 kids like spring but don't like that there will be a 3 hour offline gap smack in the middle of the day. So, if we wanted a baby sitter etc. it would be impossible unless that person was willing to do their distance learning (which I think is too big an ask knowing my kids).
Anonymous wrote:Why are you unhappy?