Anonymous wrote:10:26 PP, I cited the statistics precisely because I know this forum is full of people that every time someone mentions pelvic floor damage they say “because vaginal birth!”.
I’m fine with whatever birth you want to have, as long as it’s informed. No birth choice will make you better. Saying that pelvic floor damage has to be accepted when you have a vaginal birth is not informed. If you prefer a c-section that’s fine, but don’t push it on others under false arguments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who the heck thinks men have a “right” to sexual function?
LMAO. Like every man ever and about 50% of pick me ass women.
And pharmaceutical and insurance companies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who the heck thinks men have a “right” to sexual function?
LMAO. Like every man ever and about 50% of pick me ass women.
Anonymous wrote:Who the heck thinks men have a “right” to sexual function?
Anonymous wrote:Who the heck thinks men have a “right” to sexual function?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1. To avoid this, read and prepare yourself on how to avoid pelvic floor damage. Be ready to advocate for yourself.
Statistics of models with fewer medical interventions have a completely different distribution of pelvic floor damage, so this is not something normal that comes with vaginal birth that we just have to accept. See for one the statistics of Ina May Gaskin’s center, there are similar statistics available for birth centers in the UK and Australia.
c sections reduce pelvic floor damage.
Not really, no. Wouldn't it be nice if it did?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1. To avoid this, read and prepare yourself on how to avoid pelvic floor damage. Be ready to advocate for yourself.
Statistics of models with fewer medical interventions have a completely different distribution of pelvic floor damage, so this is not something normal that comes with vaginal birth that we just have to accept. See for one the statistics of Ina May Gaskin’s center, there are similar statistics available for birth centers in the UK and Australia.
c sections reduce pelvic floor damage.
Anonymous wrote:+1. To avoid this, read and prepare yourself on how to avoid pelvic floor damage. Be ready to advocate for yourself.
Statistics of models with fewer medical interventions have a completely different distribution of pelvic floor damage, so this is not something normal that comes with vaginal birth that we just have to accept. See for one the statistics of Ina May Gaskin’s center, there are similar statistics available for birth centers in the UK and Australia.
Anonymous wrote:+1. To avoid this, read and prepare yourself on how to avoid pelvic floor damage. Be ready to advocate for yourself.
Statistics of models with fewer medical interventions have a completely different distribution of pelvic floor damage, so this is not something normal that comes with vaginal birth that we just have to accept. See for one the statistics of Ina May Gaskin’s center, there are similar statistics available for birth centers in the UK and Australia.
Anonymous wrote:+1. To avoid this, read and prepare yourself on how to avoid pelvic floor damage. Be ready to advocate for yourself.
Statistics of models with fewer medical interventions have a completely different distribution of pelvic floor damage, so this is not something normal that comes with vaginal birth that we just have to accept. See for one the statistics of Ina May Gaskin’s center, there are similar statistics available for birth centers in the UK and Australia.