Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
DP.. what's the 7 day rolling average? Is nova/VA seeing cases go up even as the rate is below 5%? Then that's a concern. NY's rate is flat or going down. That's why they feel it's ok to re-open.
Their teachers are willing to teacher. So there that.
I wouldn't assume that. I know NY teachers who are really upset about the schools reopening. But they are afraid to speak out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
NP
I think that’s a big barrier. Nobody has taken the lead here (I’m in NoVA) to set that metric. Everyone is looking to somebody else to set it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Many NOVA jurisdictions positivity rate is below 5%. Honest question, what number are you okay with? NYC’s metric to reopen is 5%— although they are lower.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Their teachers are willing to teacher. So there that.
I wouldn't assume that. I know NY teachers who are really upset about the schools reopening. But they are afraid to speak out.
Anonymous wrote:Their teachers are willing to teacher. So there that.
Anonymous wrote:Teachers are willing to teach because the risk of infection is considerably lower.
Solve the virus spread and you solve the problems of schools (and work, and travel, and just about everything else). But most people here would rather just argue about the everything else rather than solve the real problem.
Anonymous wrote:Their teachers are willing to teacher. So there that.