Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s an excellent article on the Ascent in the September issue of MotorTrend magazine.
They’ve have a long-term test of the Ascent going for just over a year.
In that time, it’s required 6 visits to the dealer for a total of $1,770 in warranty repairs, from everything from a defective airbag sensor, to a windshield, warning lights for the transmission fluid temp, and defective sensors in the Eyesight safety system.
It’s a good article. Anyone looking at Ascents should read it.
And if you’re looking for the most reliable long-term test SUV they’ve tested in the last couple years? The Dodge Durango R/T. $77 in warranty work, one dealer visit.
DCUM probably doesn’t approve of a Dodge Durango though, so you’ll have to get something less reliable to keep from being labeled low class or even a Buy-‘Murican Trumper. Sorry.
Cheapest in MT's long-term fleet is not exactly a great metric for reliability. They don't put the Highlander and Seqouia in those tests because "boring to drive, $150 dealer visit for an oil change and tire rotation, zero unexpected issues" ad nauseum for 12-36 months is not interesting to read.
Anonymous wrote:There’s an excellent article on the Ascent in the September issue of MotorTrend magazine.
They’ve have a long-term test of the Ascent going for just over a year.
In that time, it’s required 6 visits to the dealer for a total of $1,770 in warranty repairs, from everything from a defective airbag sensor, to a windshield, warning lights for the transmission fluid temp, and defective sensors in the Eyesight safety system.
It’s a good article. Anyone looking at Ascents should read it.
And if you’re looking for the most reliable long-term test SUV they’ve tested in the last couple years? The Dodge Durango R/T. $77 in warranty work, one dealer visit.
DCUM probably doesn’t approve of a Dodge Durango though, so you’ll have to get something less reliable to keep from being labeled low class or even a Buy-‘Murican Trumper. Sorry.
Anonymous wrote:Power is more than adequate for most people.
Good mileage comes at price.
Anonymous wrote:Risky due to recent quality issues at Subaru. They got too big too quickly.
Anonymous wrote:Seemed potentially very underpowered when I test drove it.
There were 3 adults in the vehicle. I’m about 220 lbs, my wife is about 110 lb, and the salesperson was a rather large woman, I’d guess maybe 250ish lbs.
While it had what I would consider an adequate level of power for the three of us, I could tell from engine feel and the tachometer, that it was working pretty hard. It clearly had “no more to give” with the 3 of us on board. Meaning that any further weight - like 3 more people, or luggage or sports equipment for kids, it would definitely be in the underpowered range. Possibly dangerously underpowered.
A turbo charged gasoline 4 cylinder of only 2.5 liters just isn’t enough engine for a vehicle this size. Not if you’re going to expect to use it anywhere near its maximum rated load capacity. This car is absolutely begging for a big 6 cylinder engine, or even a 8 cylinder if Subaru ever decided to build such a Boxer engine.
But it’s definitely short on power.
If you’re a single driver who will never have more than two other people in the vehicle, then it’s probably fine as it is.
But if that’s the case, then why are you looking at a 7 passenger 3 row SUV in the first place?