Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds pretty low-risk.
Are you kidding me? That’s a shit-ton.
On what planet is 0.08% a shit ton of anything?
On a planet where the R-number exceeds 1. Put that many positive kids in a school building and it will. Quickly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds pretty low-risk.
Yep...but likely they'd infect others before being diagnosed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds pretty low-risk.
Are you kidding me? That’s a shit-ton.
On what planet is 0.08% a shit ton of anything?
Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/30/world/australia/melbourne-schools-lessons-america.html
And your statistics from above say nothing about the adults those four kids might infect. Guess kids are in school by themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds pretty low-risk.
Are you kidding me? That’s a shit-ton.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds pretty low-risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A new study is attempting to estimate the number of kids infected per XXX students in a school on opening day.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/31/us/coronavirus-school-reopening-risk.html
For D.C., where the overall numbers aren’t as bad as parts of the South, the estimates are about 4 kids per 1,000 will be carrying the virus.
Interesting article about this new study. You can search any county and alter the school size with their calculator.
That’d be 6 at Deal and 8 at Wilson on any given day.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds pretty low-risk.
Anonymous wrote:A new study is attempting to estimate the number of kids infected per XXX students in a school on opening day.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/31/us/coronavirus-school-reopening-risk.html
For D.C., where the overall numbers aren’t as bad as parts of the South, the estimates are about 4 kids per 1,000 will be carrying the virus.
Interesting article about this new study. You can search any county and alter the school size with their calculator.