Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s inherently privileged. It is not inherently racist.
There was advice in the NYT article to invite economically disadvantaged students to join your pods. I doubt anyone on DCUM will.
This. People have also suggested that, while you do what is best for your family, put a little time/energy in ensuring equity for others. For instance, encourage your schools to get technology out to everyone who needs it. The point is, for those of us with privilege, not to forget that others do not have privilege and still need our support/help in getting what they need. Whether that is inviting someone into your pod, donating to a cause helping others, or using your voice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying it's racist and privileged to hire a tutor or form pods. What's even more ridiculous is suggesting to make it illegal or force parents to include others for free to promote diversity of race and income. Lol good luck.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10220656647060383&set=a.1168976058860&type=3&theater
I’m sick and tired of people using racist in this way. It diminishes the term and it makes it seem that all black ppl or minorities can’t afford pods. That’s wrong to assume since some of us actually can afford to do the same. Some of us are also forming pods! Honestly this whole thing is just so taxing- real racism is being dragged by the KKK in the middle of the night.
Anonymous wrote:It’s inherently privileged. It is not inherently racist.
There was advice in the NYT article to invite economically disadvantaged students to join your pods. I doubt anyone on DCUM will.
Anonymous wrote:I fail to see why if you have kids getting together to study in pods with a tutor you can't accompolish the same thing in a school.
Spread some of the classes out into the gym and cafeteria.
Anonymous wrote:I think there’s it’s extremely risky (and morally bankrupt) to ignore the different effects distance learning is going to have on various community members/groups but I don’t know if this take on it is the most effective. It feels like it will put people stressed/frantic people who would be amenable/educable on the defensive about their very human efforts to work something out for their kids (which in the end helps no one.) Rich urban liberals can be powerful advocates, to put it diplomatically, and this doesn’t feel it’s poised to harness that potential.
Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying it's racist and privileged to hire a tutor or form pods. What's even more ridiculous is suggesting to make it illegal or force parents to include others for free to promote diversity of race and income. Lol good luck.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10220656647060383&set=a.1168976058860&type=3&theater
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying it's racist and privileged to hire a tutor or form pods. What's even more ridiculous is suggesting to make it illegal or force parents to include others for free to promote diversity of race and income. Lol good luck.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10220656647060383&set=a.1168976058860&type=3&theater
I’m sick and tired of people using racist in this way. It diminishes the term and it makes it seem that all black ppl or minorities can’t afford pods. That’s wrong to assume since some of us actually can afford to do the same. Some of us are also forming pods! Honestly this whole thing is just so taxing- real racism is being dragged by the KKK in the middle of the night.
Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying it's racist and privileged to hire a tutor or form pods. What's even more ridiculous is suggesting to make it illegal or force parents to include others for free to promote diversity of race and income. Lol good luck.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10220656647060383&set=a.1168976058860&type=3&theater