Anonymous wrote:how much of colleges postponing has to do with leagues not wanting to force schools to bring kids back on campus? I think parents separately driving to fields where less than 30 kids play on a field and then driving home separately is not the same level of risk as a coach filled with dozens of students and staff traveling to a stadium, having a game and then returning to drop the kids off at dorms
Anonymous wrote:It is not encouraging, but there are a number of additional factors that come into play for college sports. Things like shared residential facilities and travel. How and where to separate and isolate an ill player if necessary, what is the college's responsibility for that player's care who is away from home etc.
That set of issues is simpler for youth soccer. Doesn't mean it will happen, but I don't think college cancellation directly leads to cancellation of the corresponding youth sport.
Anonymous wrote:
I believe we will have fall soccer but not the way it has been in the past and I will be happy to take what we can get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, they are very different things. We shall see--I have seen travel baseball playing.
Nobody has drawn any conclusions about what it means for youth soccer. But when baseball started numbers were level but our numbers are now starting to climb back up.
This is a very fluid situation but I would not dismiss the postponement of fall collegiate seasons as a nothing burger for youth sports. One is certainly a much bigger machine to simply change course BUT they did change course with certainly far more on the line than say NCSL. It is both easier to start and stop a season for NCSL than it is a D1 program.
Again, the frustrating part on these boards is for many people to not see the nuance in things or the shades of gray.
Scaled and proportional risk is one thing but folks seem to just want everything at once without any level of patience.
Postponing the A10 doesn't mean local youth soccer is going to be cancelled but it is certainly a canary in the mine-shaft that the fall will likely not go very smoothly either for local youth soccer.
rates may have gone up, but guess what? more people went to more stores that were open during that time also. there is zero correlation between youth sports and covid rates. i'm happy to learn about them should they be scientifically proven.
Anonymous wrote:how much of colleges postponing has to do with leagues not wanting to force schools to bring kids back on campus? I think parents separately driving to fields where less than 30 kids play on a field and then driving home separately is not the same level of risk as a coach filled with dozens of students and staff traveling to a stadium, having a game and then returning to drop the kids off at dorms
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, they are very different things. We shall see--I have seen travel baseball playing.
Nobody has drawn any conclusions about what it means for youth soccer. But when baseball started numbers were level but our numbers are now starting to climb back up.
This is a very fluid situation but I would not dismiss the postponement of fall collegiate seasons as a nothing burger for youth sports. One is certainly a much bigger machine to simply change course BUT they did change course with certainly far more on the line than say NCSL. It is both easier to start and stop a season for NCSL than it is a D1 program.
Again, the frustrating part on these boards is for many people to not see the nuance in things or the shades of gray.
Scaled and proportional risk is one thing but folks seem to just want everything at once without any level of patience.
Postponing the A10 doesn't mean local youth soccer is going to be cancelled but it is certainly a canary in the mine-shaft that the fall will likely not go very smoothly either for local youth soccer.
Anonymous wrote:Well, they are very different things. We shall see--I have seen travel baseball playing.
Anonymous wrote:Well this should not have any impact on travel soccer....lol!