Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t IVF on the table?
She basically said it would be a waste of money. The numbers only gave it a 5% success rate.
So, IUI would be better how?
If you really want to do this, it's donor egg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t IVF on the table?
She basically said it would be a waste of money. The numbers only gave it a 5% success rate.
So, IUI would be better how?
If you really want to do this, it's donor egg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with others that donor egg would probably be best for you at your age. Fertility can really fall off a cliff all at once when you get into your forties (happened to me between 42 and 43 - I did six IVF cycles and there was a shockingly stark drop-off, not in numbers of eggs but in the normal ones when we tested the embryos). But, you might try some IUIs while you get the donor egg cycle up and running if you can afford it. Doesn't it take some time to find a donor and get everything set up? Good luck!
How long is the donor cycle process? The entire process.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with others that donor egg would probably be best for you at your age. Fertility can really fall off a cliff all at once when you get into your forties (happened to me between 42 and 43 - I did six IVF cycles and there was a shockingly stark drop-off, not in numbers of eggs but in the normal ones when we tested the embryos). But, you might try some IUIs while you get the donor egg cycle up and running if you can afford it. Doesn't it take some time to find a donor and get everything set up? Good luck!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t IVF on the table?
She basically said it would be a waste of money. The numbers only gave it a 5% success rate.
Anonymous wrote:Why isn’t IVF on the table?
Anonymous wrote:If she thinks it’s an egg quality issue, what’s her rationale for why an IUI would help?