Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, we can't say definitively that the teacher got infected at school. We know people in AZ have not really been staying home, so it's possible she could have got it somewhere else.
It doesn’t matter where she got it. The result will be the same for hybrid/in person. The class/school will shut down for 14 days minimum. I don’t know why people are harping in getting it at school. It does not change the result.
People are posting this story as supposed proof that it is unsafe for teachers to be in the school building (in support of 100% DL). People are pointing out that she may have gotten it elsewhere.
True, but it spread to the other two adults who were in school spending hours together but taking all recommended precautions. That's the dangerous part.
Most transmissions are adult-adult or adult-kid. I would definitely eliminate in-person contact between teachers/staff in the fall, to the extent possible. Staff mtgs can be virtual. Teachers' lounge can be one at a time to get lunch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, we can't say definitively that the teacher got infected at school. We know people in AZ have not really been staying home, so it's possible she could have got it somewhere else.
It doesn’t matter where she got it. The result will be the same for hybrid/in person. The class/school will shut down for 14 days minimum. I don’t know why people are harping in getting it at school. It does not change the result.
People are posting this story as supposed proof that it is unsafe for teachers to be in the school building (in support of 100% DL). People are pointing out that she may have gotten it elsewhere.
True, but it spread to the other two adults who were in school spending hours together but taking all recommended precautions. That's the dangerous part.
Anonymous wrote:I wish DCPS would consider all sorts of possible plans. For high school, for instance, consider having more in-person school for grades 9 and 12 since they are pivotal (adjusting to high school and finishing high school) and have 10th and 11th be primarily DL (they've already adjusted to high school).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, we can't say definitively that the teacher got infected at school. We know people in AZ have not really been staying home, so it's possible she could have got it somewhere else.
It doesn’t matter where she got it. The result will be the same for hybrid/in person. The class/school will shut down for 14 days minimum. I don’t know why people are harping in getting it at school. It does not change the result.
People are posting this story as supposed proof that it is unsafe for teachers to be in the school building (in support of 100% DL). People are pointing out that she may have gotten it elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, we can't say definitively that the teacher got infected at school. We know people in AZ have not really been staying home, so it's possible she could have got it somewhere else.
It doesn’t matter where she got it. The result will be the same for hybrid/in person. The class/school will shut down for 14 days minimum. I don’t know why people are harping in getting it at school. It does not change the result.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you consider that obesity, asthma, diabetes, heart disease etc. are pre-existing conditions, you are talking about a MAJORITY of adults. So it's not really useful to point them out as a reason why in person teaching is a good idea.
A majority of adults OVER A CERTAIN AGE.
In 2017–2018, the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity in adults was 42.4%, and there were no significant differences between men and women among all adults or by age group.
42% of adults are obese. That's just one of the preexisting conditions.
Anonymous wrote:Also, we can't say definitively that the teacher got infected at school. We know people in AZ have not really been staying home, so it's possible she could have got it somewhere else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you consider that obesity, asthma, diabetes, heart disease etc. are pre-existing conditions, you are talking about a MAJORITY of adults. So it's not really useful to point them out as a reason why in person teaching is a good idea.
A majority of adults OVER A CERTAIN AGE.
Anonymous wrote:When you consider that obesity, asthma, diabetes, heart disease etc. are pre-existing conditions, you are talking about a MAJORITY of adults. So it's not really useful to point them out as a reason why in person teaching is a good idea.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of use of this tragedy of the teacher who died out in Arizona as justification for DL ONLY
BUT what no one is being honest about is that, according to what is also reported in the original news story, that teacher had 3 pre-existing conditions:
Lupus
Diabetes
Asthma
Each of which qualified her for paid work from home. So, questions you should be asking is not WHY should schools Re-OPEN, instead ask:
1) Did the HR in her school district publish and list the qualifiying conditions for which a teacher could get paid leave or DL paid ?
DCPS has met this requirement
2) Did this teacher see her MD prior to returning to in person teaching ?
DCPS requires this also
Were ALL state metrics met prior to re-open phase: contact tracing levels at 100% within 24 hours and percent positive test below 5 % for the muncipality where she lived taught
If NOT, don't blame the school children blame the policies NOT ENFORCED
DC can do better