Anonymous wrote:You are looking at it from the child care worker perspective, but the price and the compensation are set from the consumer perspective and the business model.
Product 1: nanny 1:1 care in your home with a developing relationship, plus some home extras. One employer, one employee, no overhead. Most expensive product, all profit to one person.
Product 2: nanny share 1:2-4 care in your home with same extra benefits to at least one of the clients. Two employers splitting the slightly less expensive per person cost; all profit to one person with no overhead.
Product 3: your child is one of many with multiple care givers in a center. Least expensive for client; lots of overhead, most profit to center who pays the employee the lowest possible rate they can get away with; highest profit model to center comes from more clients and fewer workers (which is why it is regulated).
The price is set by the product. In models 1 and 2 all the profit goes to one person with no overhead, while in model 3 it goes to a center that pays overhead and itself before the employees get a cut, which is their salary and benefits. There are more customers paying in (albeit smaller amounts), but more entities being paid from the same profit pot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with both. The preschool teacher is underpaid. The people who think it's insulting to pay nannies less than $25-30/hr don't realize that most of the middle clasa must then feel constantly insulted every single day.
So? I do think other people, especially women, are underpaid but that doesn’t change my nanny’s rent or cost of food. All people should have a living wage.
Sure all people should have a living wage. But I didn't make more than $30/hr until i was almost 30, my husband still doesn't (even though we also have to pay for rent, food, and childcare!), and so when people act like that is the minimum wage it comes off really clueless. There are a LOT of people in this country who don't make $25-30/hr, and sure, obviously we don't hire nannies, but saying that "important work" should make at least that much is out of touch with the realities of a lot of working people. It comes off as judging people for being cheap or devaluing childcare, when maybe they just can't afford it, which is morally neutral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree with both. The preschool teacher is underpaid. The people who think it's insulting to pay nannies less than $25-30/hr don't realize that most of the middle clasa must then feel constantly insulted every single day.
So? I do think other people, especially women, are underpaid but that doesn’t change my nanny’s rent or cost of food. All people should have a living wage.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with both. The preschool teacher is underpaid. The people who think it's insulting to pay nannies less than $25-30/hr don't realize that most of the middle clasa must then feel constantly insulted every single day.