Anonymous wrote:I'd rather schools don't open in the fall because it will be another catastrophic failure. The other thread about the principals who came down with COVID after meeting to discuss reopening is just the prelude to this disaster.
Anonymous wrote:I'd rather schools don't open in the fall because it will be another catastrophic failure. The other thread about the principals who came down with COVID after meeting to discuss reopening is just the prelude to this disaster.
Anonymous wrote:They should close bars, any large gatherings other than day care/preschool/k-12 moving forward.
They should also close colleges and universities. They should reopen businesses with strict SD.
Hopefully this would limit community spread to only occurring at schools. And with good protocols, they could trace and quarantine folks who get it.
Right now people are socializing and moving around which means containing school outbreaks will be challenging. But if you close down the other stuff, you could open schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The source is a professor of public health at Harvard.
And the study had 23 subjects up to age 16.
Ok, so you don't care about the study. The main point is that the only way to reopen schools is to keep the rate of transmission in the community (not the schools) low. We do this by scaling back higher risk activities. The choice is bars or schools. We are not going to be able to have both. Instead of stomping your feet and demanding in person school, why are you not stomping your feet and demanding more sensible actions to reduce the spread of the virus in the community? I just don't understand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The source is a professor of public health at Harvard.
And the study had 23 subjects up to age 16.
Ok, so you don't care about the study. The main point is that the only way to reopen schools is to keep the rate of transmission in the community (not the schools) low. We do this by scaling back higher risk activities. The choice is bars or schools. We are not going to be able to have both. Instead of stomping your feet and demanding in person school, why are you not stomping your feet and demanding more sensible actions to reduce the spread of the virus in the community? I just don't understand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The source is a professor of public health at Harvard.
And the study had 23 subjects up to age 16.
Anonymous wrote:The source is a professor of public health at Harvard.
Reopening is a community-wide project. Whether a school can reopen safely, for example, doesn’t just depend on capacity, personal protective equipment, or individual actions. It depends on how widespread the coronavirus is in the community outside the school’s walls.
Coronavirus outbreaks play out in similar terms. Getting people to stay 6 feet from each other, wear masks, wash their hands, and stagger groups to keep overall numbers down helps. But if a community is flooded with infections, the chances are much higher that those infections will creep in no matter how many protective steps are embraced. The school or restaurant in question will become yet another place where people can meet and transmit the virus, and that will make the epidemic worse.
It’s this rationale that’s led some experts to frame reopening in more zero-sum terms — to argue that the most important thing we could do to reopen any particular place or venue is reduce community transmission.
In other words: If you want to reopen schools this fall, then you need to get the spread of Covid-19 down, as close to zero as possible, this summer. And that means opting not to reopen — possibly at all and definitely not at full capacity — restaurants, bars, nightclubs, or other places that will lead to significantly more coronavirus spread but have less value to society than schools.