Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
This. As soon as a school has a case, they’ll be shut.
That isn’t the plan. Contact testing, not closing the whole thing.
They would have to test hundreds of people every time this happens. And who pays for the contact testing, the school system?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
This. As soon as a school has a case, they’ll be shut.
That isn’t the plan. Contact testing, not closing the whole thing.
Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
This. As soon as a school has a case, they’ll be shut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One of the things that worries me with all of the expenses that will be incurred this year, with the extra cleaning, buses. Technology, hand sanitizer, masks etc. is that after a few weeks, some new report will come along and say it’s safe for everyone to be back at school, and we will have spent millions for practically nothing.
Look at the American Pediatric report that just came out urging schools to reopen. I think it’s fair to say that if this had been released six weeks earlier, we would not be going into the fall with schools only attending in person classes twice a week. I suppose Northam feels like it’s too late to backtrack now, but does this mean he’s likely to reverse course a month into the school year? Schools are facing their lowest budgets ever and now they have to risk spending millions for something that may not be used beyond a few weeks? What is the solution to this? Or is there one?
What they spend is not something I care about at all. What a strange thing to be focused on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
I agree. My worry is that schools are going to do tons of work to get ready for a hybrid model and then we will almost immediately have to switch to DL and we won't be fully prepared for that.
Anonymous wrote:One of the things that worries me with all of the expenses that will be incurred this year, with the extra cleaning, buses. Technology, hand sanitizer, masks etc. is that after a few weeks, some new report will come along and say it’s safe for everyone to be back at school, and we will have spent millions for practically nothing.
Look at the American Pediatric report that just came out urging schools to reopen. I think it’s fair to say that if this had been released six weeks earlier, we would not be going into the fall with schools only attending in person classes twice a week. I suppose Northam feels like it’s too late to backtrack now, but does this mean he’s likely to reverse course a month into the school year? Schools are facing their lowest budgets ever and now they have to risk spending millions for something that may not be used beyond a few weeks? What is the solution to this? Or is there one?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
I agree. My worry is that schools are going to do tons of work to get ready for a hybrid model and then we will almost immediately have to switch to DL and we won't be fully prepared for that.
Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.
Anonymous wrote:Unlikely. Much more likely everyone goes to 100% DL.