Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it will vary by state. I have a friend who left the corporate world to get trained to be a teacher. She did one of those alternate programs. She is in a state where teachers are paid well and get tenure. Well nobody wanted to leave their job. She ended up subbing and then moving on to a job where she could get health insurance.
As far as I’m concerned tenure is a thing of the past. DCUMers and the likes nationwide didn’t like that teachers were set for life (professionally speaking) and so they got rid of such privilege. FL started it and the rest followed suit.
Can you sure which state your friend is in?
Anonymous wrote:I think it will vary by state. I have a friend who left the corporate world to get trained to be a teacher. She did one of those alternate programs. She is in a state where teachers are paid well and get tenure. Well nobody wanted to leave their job. She ended up subbing and then moving on to a job where she could get health insurance.
Anonymous wrote:Teachers should not hold the US economy hostage. By refusing to go back to school this is what is happening.
If they do, it should be treated like the air traffic control or defunding of police. Fire all of them and have them re-apply and give exingency teacher certs to qualified people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:not very promising...
https://www.weareteachers.com/teachers-afraid-to-go-back/?utm_source=WAT_MDR&utm_medium=Enews&utm_campaign=WAT_Enews06112020
I have read many posters talking about there are no teacher shortages and that teachers would not resign.
Talk about uncertainty!
What could this really mean for our children?
There are plenty of new teachers graduating from their programs desperate for a job. What it means is we will have a less experienced staff, but also likely more optimistic and less cynical about the profession. It will cost the school system less. Some will be stars who were meant for this, others will be green as can be. Some of who we lose will be true seasoned gems and a huge loss, a small subset of who leaves will be teachers who don't belong in the profession anyway.
Anonymous wrote:not very promising...
https://www.weareteachers.com/teachers-afraid-to-go-back/?utm_source=WAT_MDR&utm_medium=Enews&utm_campaign=WAT_Enews06112020
I have read many posters talking about there are no teacher shortages and that teachers would not resign.
Talk about uncertainty!
What could this really mean for our children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUMs answer has been that school systems will just need to hire any warm body, quickly certify them, and move on.
There’s such a public misunderstanding of the certification process, even for emergency certification.
It basically means expanding TFA-quality instruction and staff churn to 20% of schools. And those schools might be DCUM schools because W teachers are also afraid of catching the coronavirus.
It also means this: A lot of teachers are able to keep teaching because they are subsidized by a high earner spouse who offsets the low pay and the spending OOP for classroom supplies. I think a big percentage of the 1 in 5 will be those teachers since they can afford to leave in this economy. Who will be left: the teachers working a second job to make ends meet and the brand new teachers. This group is already stressed and likely to leave the profession.
The rush to reopen schools F2F will impact the profession for decades. I would not be surprised if public schools simply moved to one year contracts in the future and treated employees the way many retail and fast food places do.
Accurate analysis. However, as a teacher I must say that CURRENTLY we sign 1 year (10 months really) contracts and believe me we are not treated any better than retail and fast food employees. If anything, coronavirus will exacerbate the teacher shortages. Thus, our children’s education will plummet (even more than it already does) and then the country will resort to (need to) hire foreigners to do the job.
Don’t has me for the last sentence. I am an immigrant.
Anonymous wrote:DCUMs answer has been that school systems will just need to hire any warm body, quickly certify them, and move on.
There’s such a public misunderstanding of the certification process, even for emergency certification.
It basically means expanding TFA-quality instruction and staff churn to 20% of schools. And those schools might be DCUM schools because W teachers are also afraid of catching the coronavirus.
It also means this: A lot of teachers are able to keep teaching because they are subsidized by a high earner spouse who offsets the low pay and the spending OOP for classroom supplies. I think a big percentage of the 1 in 5 will be those teachers since they can afford to leave in this economy. Who will be left: the teachers working a second job to make ends meet and the brand new teachers. This group is already stressed and likely to leave the profession.
The rush to reopen schools F2F will impact the profession for decades. I would not be surprised if public schools simply moved to one year contracts in the future and treated employees the way many retail and fast food places do.