jsteele wrote:Janeese will do great. It would be hard to do worse than Todd. Todd's list of accomplishments is so thin that he has to lie and/or exaggerate on his mailers.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve met them both. Todd strikes me as slimey and agree that I would not want to vote for Bowsers sidekick, especially after the past few months.
Janeese is earnest, but her extreme position on crime is dangerous and ignorant.
Anonymous wrote:What do people think? Our listserv is dominated by this topic, with a few particularly ardent Todd supporters. Im not a huge fan of Todd and I like George’s endorsements, but do people think she’s too inexperienced?
Anonymous wrote:Two pretty dismal choices. Todd is little more than Bowser's lackey. George's promises to massively defund MPD are frankly terrifying. She will be worse for public safety than that dimwit Nadeau has been for her ward.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. People have praised his constituent services, but to borrow a TX phrase he is “all hat, no cattle,” IME. He often will seem to be on top of things if asked publicly in the listserv, for show, but then doesn’t follow up. I don’t understand the proliferation of Todd signs on lawns if his track record is mediocre.[/quote
Interesting. We live in Brightwood (very near Takoma) and I see at least 4 Janeese lawn signs for every Todd.
Anonymous wrote:Two pretty dismal choices. Todd is little more than Bowser's lackey. George's promises to massively defund MPD are frankly terrifying. She will be worse for public safety than that dimwit Nadeau has been for her ward.
Anonymous wrote:Two pretty dismal choices. Todd is little more than Bowser's lackey. George's promises to massively defund MPD are frankly terrifying. She will be worse for public safety than that dimwit Nadeau has been for her ward.