Anonymous wrote:The issue was the man had a knife and was running toward him. However, it sounded like multiple shots and that sounded excessive. He could have shot him in the leg once to stop him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sucks he was given no other choice. The need to have more non lethal options available for officers, but the cop didn't do anything wrong here.
Of course he had a choice. He could’ve chosen not to shoot that man.
Why did the cop stand his ground? He could’ve backed away, he could’ve put his cruiser in between him and his victim. He could’ve waited for back up. He could’ve done any number of things that didn’t involve shooting that man.
Anonymous wrote:That was straight up murder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sucks he was given no other choice. The need to have more non lethal options available for officers, but the cop didn't do anything wrong here.
Of course he had a choice. He could’ve chosen not to shoot that man.
Why did the cop stand his ground? He could’ve backed away, he could’ve put his cruiser in between him and his victim. He could’ve waited for back up. He could’ve done any number of things that didn’t involve shooting that man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who objects to "officer-involved shooting" to mean "a police officer shot someone"?
Yes. You are.
Anonymous wrote:Sucks he was given no other choice. The need to have more non lethal options available for officers, but the cop didn't do anything wrong here.
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who objects to "officer-involved shooting" to mean "a police officer shot someone"?
Anonymous wrote:Warning it is graphic . Curious why they haven’t released video of the Potomac shooting from a few months ago . The family alleges he was killed while still asleep https://twitter.com/mcpnews/status/1258898908178190339?s=21
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one who objects to "officer-involved shooting" to mean "a police officer shot someone"?