Anonymous wrote:We limited screens to TV (and limited TV) until way into elementary school. At some point you are handicapping your child if you don't allow screens. It's what their entire generation knows and not only will they be culturally ignorant, but they will be ill equipped to enter the workforce or get a high school job or do anything at all, really, if they're not comfortable with screens, which are a part of our lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would you allow screens when kids start reading? It’s fine. I just don’t understand the logic.
NP here. Reading is a richer form of self-entertainment that engages more of the brain. I’d like DD to be reading before she watching a TV show too.
But wouldn’t it make sense to cut out the TV when they start reading? Why introduce it then?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would you allow screens when kids start reading? It’s fine. I just don’t understand the logic.
Dp. We enabled subtitles to squeeze in extra reading, lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would you allow screens when kids start reading? It’s fine. I just don’t understand the logic.
NP here. Reading is a richer form of self-entertainment that engages more of the brain. I’d like DD to be reading before she watching a TV show too.
Anonymous wrote:Why would you allow screens when kids start reading? It’s fine. I just don’t understand the logic.
Anonymous wrote:Why would you allow screens when kids start reading? It’s fine. I just don’t understand the logic.
Anonymous wrote:We’re dedicated to no screens (meaning TV, iPad, phone - obviously he sees screens in the world).
Was there an age or milestone (like reading) where you allowed limited screentime?
TIA