Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DA parent (yes I know former or demised or whatever we are calling it) and the answer to your question is No. My kid is an 04 that cant risk playing in an unproven league that will get leftover players/teams.
Whats the point of doing so when established reputable options exist elsewhere
You believe changing clubs junior year is smart?
Anonymous wrote:So much for Arlington and FCV joining GAL. Well, maybe the club could still join GAL, but the Arlington/FCV teams will not include any of their former DA players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter. When clubs decide what leagues their teams will play in, they’ll convey what level it’ll be. For example: ECNL will be top tier, and have 24-26 players on a roster with playing time earned and not promised. Second team kids will get told there will be opportunities to play up, but with large rosters that’ll be especially hard.
For bigger non-ECNL clubs, they’re setting themselves up and they’ll do the same with their teams and players. All clubs with more players will end up getting more playing time overall, just not in the realm of ECNL. Whether it’s GAL, EDP, etc.
The only real problem will be those small clubs. One team per age group, missing teams in age groups, poor standings in leagues, etc. Players generally move “up”, not down.
Two of the best clubs in the country(Legends and Beach), who were not given entry into ECNL, have joined the ECNL Regional League(ECNL2) instead of joining GAL. GAL looks like the 3rd best option to most clubs. Doubt GAL will work in the long run.
https://www.eliteclubsnationalleague.com/2020/04/22/ecnl-girls-announces-new-additions-to-the-ecnl-regional-league-southwest-for-2020-21-season/
Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter. When clubs decide what leagues their teams will play in, they’ll convey what level it’ll be. For example: ECNL will be top tier, and have 24-26 players on a roster with playing time earned and not promised. Second team kids will get told there will be opportunities to play up, but with large rosters that’ll be especially hard.
For bigger non-ECNL clubs, they’re setting themselves up and they’ll do the same with their teams and players. All clubs with more players will end up getting more playing time overall, just not in the realm of ECNL. Whether it’s GAL, EDP, etc.
The only real problem will be those small clubs. One team per age group, missing teams in age groups, poor standings in leagues, etc. Players generally move “up”, not down.
Anonymous wrote:Why start a new league. Join EDP with the other DA clubs. Pipeline would play in your conference and they will add the ex-BA players. If you add Penn Fusion and PA Classic you have a very strong schedule. A new league seems like adult doing their best to weaken youth soccer. The entire point of US Soccer's decision was based on the reality that we don't need two elite national leagues.
Anonymous wrote:Would you be interested in this league for your daughter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DA parent (yes I know former or demised or whatever we are calling it) and the answer to your question is No. My kid is an 04 that cant risk playing in an unproven league that will get leftover players/teams.
Whats the point of doing so when established reputable options exist elsewhere
You believe changing clubs junior year is smart?
Anonymous wrote:DA parent (yes I know former or demised or whatever we are calling it) and the answer to your question is No. My kid is an 04 that cant risk playing in an unproven league that will get leftover players/teams.
Whats the point of doing so when established reputable options exist elsewhere