Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes!
I’ve also asked about this and been told “not now”
The date is super tiny when you’re on a phone, and it’s super annoying to take the time to reply to something time sensitive only to later see the thread is a year old.
Guess what—you’re input isn’t that important.![]()
I think “there” concern is more about their wasted time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like it when old threads are bumped. Usually lots of interesting perspective.
OP here. Me, too. I just like to know when I'm reading something old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like it when old threads are bumped. Usually lots of interesting perspective.
OP here. Me, too. I just like to know when I'm reading something old.
Anonymous wrote:I like it when old threads are bumped. Usually lots of interesting perspective.
Anonymous wrote:You seriously can't look at the date?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes!
I’ve also asked about this and been told “not now”
The date is super tiny when you’re on a phone, and it’s super annoying to take the time to reply to something time sensitive only to later see the thread is a year old.
Guess what—you’re input isn’t that important.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Yes!
I’ve also asked about this and been told “not now”
The date is super tiny when you’re on a phone, and it’s super annoying to take the time to reply to something time sensitive only to later see the thread is a year old.