Anonymous wrote:The economy will go to crap at some point in the next 20 years. It'd truly suck to be an unemployed 50s something too young to retire but too old to hire. Stability is priceless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought the federal government stopped giving pensions to new employees?
you thought wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Does the federal worker pension program include healthcare? TBH at this point in my life I would do almost anything to ensure access to quality healthcare after my working years.
Anonymous wrote:I thought the federal government stopped giving pensions to new employees?
Anonymous wrote:I've worked in the corporate sector and as a federal contractor for most of my career, and may have the opportunity to take a government job for the first time. A close friend is recruiting me for a position within his agency and he seems confident that I have a good shot at the position.
On one hand, as a single 46 year old mom with kids, I love the idea of having a stable fed job with a pension. But the stability and pension are the only advantages that I'm seeing. At my current job, I'm paid slightly more (guessing the fed job would be 15-20K less), and the commute is better, but the main reason I hesitate to take a fed job is being forced to stay within the government just to get a pension. I enjoy working and hope to work for 15-20 more years, but I'm ambitious and hard-working, and the idea of being stuck in a bureaucracy isn't that appealing. I like the option of being able to move around to different positions and challenges with different people (in a new job) if I want to.
So here's my question: given my preference for dynamic, challenging environments, but then my need for stability/retirement income as a single mom, would it make sense for me to consider this fed job? Would the pension be worth it at my age? I know age discrimination is real, but I also know that corporations and private firms desperately want women in leadership positions, so I also think being an older woman can be an advantage. Appreciate advice from anyone who's been on either side of this decision.
Anonymous wrote:The economy will go to crap at some point in the next 20 years. It'd truly suck to be an unemployed 50s something too young to retire but too old to hire. Stability is priceless.
Anonymous wrote:I've worked in the corporate sector and as a federal contractor for most of my career, and may have the opportunity to take a government job for the first time. A close friend is recruiting me for a position within his agency and he seems confident that I have a good shot at the position.
On one hand, as a single 46 year old mom with kids, I love the idea of having a stable fed job with a pension. But the stability and pension are the only advantages that I'm seeing. At my current job, I'm paid slightly more (guessing the fed job would be 15-20K less), and the commute is better, but the main reason I hesitate to take a fed job is being forced to stay within the government just to get a pension. I enjoy working and hope to work for 15-20 more years, but I'm ambitious and hard-working, and the idea of being stuck in a bureaucracy isn't that appealing. I like the option of being able to move around to different positions and challenges with different people (in a new job) if I want to.
So here's my question: given my preference for dynamic, challenging environments, but then my need for stability/retirement income as a single mom, would it make sense for me to consider this fed job? Would the pension be worth it at my age? I know age discrimination is real, but I also know that corporations and private firms desperately want women in leadership positions, so I also think being an older woman can be an advantage. Appreciate advice from anyone who's been on either side of this decision.