Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It used to be that a landlord could kick a tenant out if they were having a relative move into the unit. Not sure if that's still the case.
Landlord here. Yes, but usually that applies to _after_ the lease ends when month-to-month comes in to play. So the landlord can say they wont' renew at the end of the lease, and that's a legit reason for non-renewal.
Anonymous wrote:This totally depends on where you live. In DC it is very hard to stop being a landlord if your tenants want to stay.
Anonymous wrote:It used to be that a landlord could kick a tenant out if they were having a relative move into the unit. Not sure if that's still the case.
Anonymous wrote:If you are in DC you would still be entitled to stay month to month
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Landlords can decline to continue renting by allowing a rental license to expire. They are not indentured servants. They should give you appropriate notice.
What conflict of any kind have you had with them, as renters? What small or big things might they be unhappy about?
In certain areas, an expired rental lease defaults to a month to month
Anonymous wrote:Landlords can decline to continue renting by allowing a rental license to expire. They are not indentured servants. They should give you appropriate notice.
What conflict of any kind have you had with them, as renters? What small or big things might they be unhappy about?